Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Angela's avatar

If an advanced civilisation wanted to tell us not to attempt interstellar colonisation, why would they use such an ambiguous method as sending flying orbs that are explicable as camera glare and mylar balloons?

It's as if, in your analogy, instead of Sam being explicitly told to ask about royal propriety, the stranger left graffiti of a crown or a Burger King wrapper in the toilet and expected him to deduce that he was royalty from those ambiguous hints.

The anti-colonization aliens could send an unambigous message without revealing anything much about themselves. For example, they could simply have a clearly artificial and alien probe broadcast a message ('ALL THESE WORLDS ARE YOURS UP TO THE OORT CLOUD - ATTEMPT NO LANDING ELSEWHERE'), then self-destruct.

Perhaps the aliens have secretly sent an unambiguous message to Earth elites who have chosen to keep it secret. But if they want to warn a whole civilisation against expansion, why would they only contact elites, who might suppress, ignore and forget the message? It seems like it would be more robust to warn a whole civilisation.

The ambiguous message of merely demonstrating extraordinary capabilities doesn't seem like it would deter expansion. It might spur elites to fund telescopes to find the alien home planet, and even interstellar probes. Elites might also wrongly conclude that the aliens are time travellers or from another dimension, which would not deter expansion.

Expand full comment
Boring Radical Centrism's avatar

Why wouldn't they get caught on camera a bit more distinctly then? Like go fly above a super bowl for a couple minutes to really provide a ton of evidence they exist, instead of only appear in debatable settings?

Expand full comment
41 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?