5 Comments
User's avatar
Jack's avatar
26mEdited

AIs don't feel like descendants yet because, like your pebble example, they are not self-sustaining. If humans ceased to exist then AIs would quickly die out. Humans still need to push the pebbles around to make them move.

How much longer before the AIs become self-sustaining? Someday we may look on them as we do our children, satisfied in the knowledge that they will carry the torch forward when we're gone.

John A. Johnson's avatar

In The Selfish Gene, Richard Dawkins wrote explicitly about the descendants of nonliving replicators. I suspect he would agree with your analysis.

Alex's avatar

Your last line is what people disagree with. People are worried AIs outcompete humans, so there are no humans left and all of our biological descentants who share all the biological human things with us that make us human, including dna, will die off. Most humans don't want this. It seems like you are being very obtuse about this point.

Robin Hanson's avatar

Expressing a "worry" isn't at all the same as showing it to be likely. And AI will in fact inherit a great many things from us.

An Actor Explains's avatar

So you're saying we live in a rippling pond...

Each of us, unconsciously affecting the others.

Even thoughts and emotions may have simple but lasting repercussion across the globe.