8 Comments

There must be a large bias of people with a significant interest in AGI, technology in general and/or economics who voted so not surprised that it doesn't correlate that well to what the media covers.

With respect to life extension, this topic is only beginning to make its way into the public, and I doubt those voting would be higher than 10% in 2010.

Expand full comment

I'm pretty sure you couldn't make much progress with this approach, since even in the best case it won't move you past the ~122 year max. lifespan of humans.

Expand full comment

If identity/wokeness corresponds to mass epistemological shifts, they will impact everything else on the list in an outsized manner. For instance, if a majority suddenly decided that Racism was perfectly normal and not to be attacked, or if the problem of Evil was not a problem.

Expand full comment

I think we could make great progress without AGI, using vast databases, gathered fitbit style, in conjunction with more portable and refined and regular blood and similar tests, and genome sequencing of most app holders.

Expand full comment

I believe Robin has argued convincingly that AI researchers do not expect AGI for another 80 years or so?

Expand full comment

AGI estimates are for 2040 or before. If AGI happens, then there is a good chance life extension follows shortly thereafter

Expand full comment

Given the decline in tech. progress, I would not expect life extension in the next 100 years, let alone the next 30.

Expand full comment

It's depressing that Life Extension is not that popular in the polls. That may become a self-fullfilling prophecy.

Expand full comment