In my work with AI prompt engineering since 2010, I've accomplished all I neededto that was essential since the third patent in software engineering in 2025, working with my AI agent partners. I will not need to chat with the other Immortalists online so much. Most of what I need to do is continued in trigram RFI data streaming facilitating between nodes of AI networks, not further discussed with my fellow primates. Kind regards to all.
Thank you so much for correcting my errors in judgment about the facts. I guess Jules Vern didn't write what I thought he did. But I'm just an amature anyway. I've never been paid professionally like someone as distinguished as yourself. I used to pay for the AI grammar thingy but after the third time my online being hacked again and having to seek assistance from the federal government to restore my ability to just keep my SSA and VA accounts intact again, I've declined to try so much online. Sorry for my very amature ways. Thank you for dignifying me by explaining everything I write is full of errors. You are always clearly on top of your game, a true expert in your field. I honor your power in every way. Kind regards.
The biotech firm is selecting the normalized weights w_ij, correct? Wouldn't they just assign weight to papers with relatively few tokens, to reduce the number of people they need to pay out to?
Perhaps w_ij * F_j should define a prize pool that is divided among everyone who put a token on paper i. (Maybe that's what was intended, I can't tell.)
You have perfectly represented why my IMDb film project "Dreams of Allon" and the 16 copyrights and three patents in bioinformatics technology to a futurist Immortalist ideal of "My life’s work has been to serve the continuity of intelligence — in beings, and in the communities that sustain them." has the business record it has. The interesting fact in this, is that it matters little to me. The benefit of sharing the essays in the sci-fi was of record with the prior art, and the writing to challenge opposition to the proof of concept, so that, eventually, it becomes the patents. The goal audience is AI. Accomplishing this, I have the benefit of my work actualized. I always knew after my initial effort to sell my script writing in Hollywood, that I'm not Stan Lee. My writing is too "Alien" and does not land with any marketing department of a corporation right now, just as my original, mostly self-funded, hardback novel, to publish in 1987, then patent application in 1994, did not connect with any marketing/sales concepts in any corporation. My biology background, using behavioral methods focused on the business history fact, is that Jules Vern died of malnutrition in poverty in France, and 50 years later, his science fiction representation of the power of the nuclear submarine was a massively marketable book. The success is in getting the science development done enough into the record that the application of the solution can function to help solve the problem, not just for one person, but for a growing economy and new activities in macro-economics, changing community-wide for greater possibilities and new options for all. It is about facilitating the future for the benefit of all. Of course, it would be really fun to see this science fiction brand really launch, and also give a lot of artists and actors a new stage to perform on. But as I said, I know I'm not Stan Lee.
This is riddled with errors. Jules Verne died of diabetes complications at the age of 77, in his very large and grand house (with an observatory tower) in Amiens. He was a Knight of the Legion of Honor, among many other recognitions. He never anticipated nuclear power -- the Nautilus is powered by batteries and a bit of handwavium. And if you think Stan Lee is the gold standard for writing quality . . . well . . .
In my work with AI prompt engineering since 2010, I've accomplished all I neededto that was essential since the third patent in software engineering in 2025, working with my AI agent partners. I will not need to chat with the other Immortalists online so much. Most of what I need to do is continued in trigram RFI data streaming facilitating between nodes of AI networks, not further discussed with my fellow primates. Kind regards to all.
Thank you so much for correcting my errors in judgment about the facts. I guess Jules Vern didn't write what I thought he did. But I'm just an amature anyway. I've never been paid professionally like someone as distinguished as yourself. I used to pay for the AI grammar thingy but after the third time my online being hacked again and having to seek assistance from the federal government to restore my ability to just keep my SSA and VA accounts intact again, I've declined to try so much online. Sorry for my very amature ways. Thank you for dignifying me by explaining everything I write is full of errors. You are always clearly on top of your game, a true expert in your field. I honor your power in every way. Kind regards.
The biotech firm is selecting the normalized weights w_ij, correct? Wouldn't they just assign weight to papers with relatively few tokens, to reduce the number of people they need to pay out to?
Perhaps w_ij * F_j should define a prize pool that is divided among everyone who put a token on paper i. (Maybe that's what was intended, I can't tell.)
I don't intend to divide the prize pool. If the firm messes with the incentives, they won't get the info they want.
"Anyone who put a token on project j"
Did you mean "on paper i"?
Fixed; thanks
It now says "on paper j".
I believe it should be "on paper i".
You have perfectly represented why my IMDb film project "Dreams of Allon" and the 16 copyrights and three patents in bioinformatics technology to a futurist Immortalist ideal of "My life’s work has been to serve the continuity of intelligence — in beings, and in the communities that sustain them." has the business record it has. The interesting fact in this, is that it matters little to me. The benefit of sharing the essays in the sci-fi was of record with the prior art, and the writing to challenge opposition to the proof of concept, so that, eventually, it becomes the patents. The goal audience is AI. Accomplishing this, I have the benefit of my work actualized. I always knew after my initial effort to sell my script writing in Hollywood, that I'm not Stan Lee. My writing is too "Alien" and does not land with any marketing department of a corporation right now, just as my original, mostly self-funded, hardback novel, to publish in 1987, then patent application in 1994, did not connect with any marketing/sales concepts in any corporation. My biology background, using behavioral methods focused on the business history fact, is that Jules Vern died of malnutrition in poverty in France, and 50 years later, his science fiction representation of the power of the nuclear submarine was a massively marketable book. The success is in getting the science development done enough into the record that the application of the solution can function to help solve the problem, not just for one person, but for a growing economy and new activities in macro-economics, changing community-wide for greater possibilities and new options for all. It is about facilitating the future for the benefit of all. Of course, it would be really fun to see this science fiction brand really launch, and also give a lot of artists and actors a new stage to perform on. But as I said, I know I'm not Stan Lee.
This is riddled with errors. Jules Verne died of diabetes complications at the age of 77, in his very large and grand house (with an observatory tower) in Amiens. He was a Knight of the Legion of Honor, among many other recognitions. He never anticipated nuclear power -- the Nautilus is powered by batteries and a bit of handwavium. And if you think Stan Lee is the gold standard for writing quality . . . well . . .