I asked Claude Fable 5 to, for each 25yr period starting in 1825, find the top 5 authors arguing for strong world governance, collect the top 3 reasons each offered, integrate those into a comparable set of reasons, and finally to graph how the importance of reasons changed over time:
In the early and mid-20th century, there was great hope that war could be ended if the world had strong world governance. This hope fueled the rise of League of Nations and later the United Nations. That hope faded and died in the second half of the 20th century.
And they will get it, good and hard.
Hi there, I've been reading this blog for a very long time. Do you plan to continue sourcing your data from LLMs?
In the early and mid-20th century, there was great hope that war could be ended if the world had strong world governance. This hope fueled the rise of League of Nations and later the United Nations. That hope faded and died in the second half of the 20th century.
Preventing weapons proliferation is sort of the same class of argument as preventing war no?
yes, pretty close