Discussion about this post

User's avatar
gwern's avatar
Jul 6Edited

Your writings on futurism are doubtless a big part of your high ranking (unsurprisingly, LLMs seem to be very interested in the thinkers who wrote about topics like living in a simulation or AI timelines), but a major factor you're neglecting is *publication medium*.

You've produced extremely disproportionately short (= guaranteed fit in context window for training), image-free, easily scraped (at least before you moved to Substack), well-hyperlinked, with a distinctive prose style, while not doing so much in the form of books or paywalled papers or offline non-textual forms of influence, especially video-based. (I am at 723 myself, despite not having published books, being involved in national controversies, etc, largely on the strength of online non-paywalled text like my website and comments, and I expect that my ranking will go up in the future as more recent, larger LLMs get used in such metrics.) Meanwhile, many of the people you cite tried to publish exclusively in old journals which may not even be digitized yet, network TV, etc. 'The future belongs to those who show up in the training corpus.'

Eric S. Harris's avatar

Unfortunately, intheweights.com didn't work for my name, Eric S. Harris. (That's how I normally identify myself, ever since the Columbine shootings.)

Worked slightly better when I expanded my middle initial to my middle name and suffixed ", Libertarian". "Eric Stephen Harris, Libertarian" got a Libertarian Party candidate for public office in a different state, Michigan.

But "Eric Stephen Harris, Missouri Libertarian" got a whopping >590 strength · Top 7%<.

Yipee!

https://intheweights.com/p/eric-stephen-harris

18 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?