Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jim Balter's avatar

Sure it's awkward and could have been better written, but that's not the claim I responded to.

P.S. It's interesting to compare "walking sticks" to "walking talks". No one ever interprets the former as sticks that walk. OTOH, it seems that no one interpreted the latter as talks about walking, although they certainly could have -- so it is ambiguous, after all. But nonetheless, I immediately discerned the correct meaning when I saw the title.

Stephen Diamond's avatar

Devilish it's not, but awkward it is. The problem is, as you note, the miscue by "talks," which (rather than "walking") is what wants replacement: "Why not walking lectures?"

35 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?