Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Daniel Carrier's avatar

My initial thought is that it wouldn't be worth while unless 5% of your income is enough to hire an agent. Then I realized that since most jobs last a lot longer than something like the length of time it takes to film a movie, an agent would have a lot less work, so they could get more clients and 5% of your income will be more than enough.

Expand full comment
JW Ogden's avatar

 1. If wage differentials are positively associated industry concentration, it confirms a bias that I have that anti-trust tends to increase earning differentials in a country?2. Some employment agencies charge the employee a percent of his wages.  This could be considered a cheap from of agent?

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts