Overcoming Bias

Share this post

When Differences Make A Difference

www.overcomingbias.com

Discover more from Overcoming Bias

This is a blog on why we believe and do what we do, why we pretend otherwise, how we might do better, and what our descendants might do, if they don't all die.
Over 11,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

When Differences Make A Difference

Robin Hanson
May 21, 2007
Share this post

When Differences Make A Difference

www.overcomingbias.com
4
Share

In the May 18 Science, Philip Tetlock reviews Scott Page’s book The Difference, and basically nails it:

Casual readers could easily conclude that Page .. has clinched the argument for the egalitarians.  Indeed, Page arguably invites the interpretation that there may be no awkward efficiency-equality tradoffs when he repeatedly declares that "diversity trumps ability."  … In brief, diversity appears to trump ability – at least when we equate high ability with drawing lucky starting points in sharply constrained searches for solutions.  But elitists will argue that the game was rigged. 

Scott’s book touts the virtues of having a big toolbox.  The more tools you can try on your problem, the better your chances of solving it.  And if the individuals who are consistently best at solving some class of problems tend to have a similar tool sets, then it can be wise to also include some different "less able" people on your team, to gain access to their different tools.  This can justify promoting organizational "diversity," at least when the dimensions of diversity being considered actually correlate with differing tool sets.  Of course it is noteworthy that many people promoting ethnic, racial, or gender diversity oppose including ideological diversity. 

Scott Page was a new assistant professor at Caltech in ’93 when I was a new grad student.  He has done very well for himself since then, and recently he asked me to clarify the relation between my perspective on prediction markets and the views he describes in his book.   That is easy, as there is almost no relation. 

The point of prediction markets is to give participants incentives to shut up when they do not know, and to speak up when they have something useful to add.   Such incentives can help regardless of whether any particular kind of diversity helps or hurts in any one context – the participants will have an incentive to find and include whatever works.  Prediction markets are not about the wisdom of crowds any more than they are about the wisdom of credentialed experts – they are about the wisdom of whatever works.   

Share this post

When Differences Make A Difference

www.overcomingbias.com
4
Share
4 Comments
Share this discussion

When Differences Make A Difference

www.overcomingbias.com
Overcoming Bias Commenter
May 15

Scott Page's position provides a strong argument for democracy - always have a bunch of alternative parties hanging around, out of power; they may hit on the truth, and be needed later.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
Overcoming Bias Commenter
May 15

You write as if there's only one "point of prediction markets". Incentives are certainly important, but why should they be the only motivation?It sounds plausible that the wisdom of crowds is an important contributing factor to the accuracy of prediction markets. It would be nice to see good evidence for or against that.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
2 more comments...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Robin Hanson
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing