Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Swindle 🟦's avatar

The best writer for understanding magick (the religious practice, as distinct from "stage magic" illusions) is Aleister Crowley. His definition which serious occultists today understand well: https://www.faena.com/aleph/what-is-magic-aleister-crowley-explains

A useful excerpt:

Crowley recognized that the invocation of entities through magick was an inherent part of our psyche. In his Introduction to Lemgeton Clavicula Salomonis he explicitly states, “the spirits of Goetia are part of the human brain.”

He named his system “Thelema”, which means will. And will, as in Schopenhauer’s and Nietzsche’s philosophies, is at the center of his model of nature. Intention, just like concentration or directed flight, is one of the most recurring themes in Crowley’s vision of magick.

Magic, as he explains, is the “Science and Art that provokes Change in conformity with the Will”, and that “all intentional acts are acts of magic.” So, like Schopenhauer, Crowley noted that will had the agency to merge with the primordial flow of the universe —So, in order to act upon nature all that was needed was to channel that will together with intention.

****

For further explanation, consult "Magick Book 4" here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magick_(Book_4)

Expand full comment
Stephen Lindsay's avatar

Definitions are complex, but I think “magic” in the way you and most of the commenters so far have described it is different from “spirituality.” If “magic” is the inward-focused effort to bend the universe around one’s own will, then “spirituality” is the outward-focused recognition of and connection with a higher power outside oneself. At least 30% of Americans (the number increases as definitions are weakened) claim to have experienced such a connection (and I include myself in this group). I think this is less “rare” and “extreme” than you may think. The persistence of spirituality in the modern world may be explained by the persistence of spiritual experience.

Expand full comment
91 more comments...

No posts