Overcoming Bias

Share this post

There Is No Science

www.overcomingbias.com

Discover more from Overcoming Bias

This is a blog on why we believe and do what we do, why we pretend otherwise, how we might do better, and what our descendants might do, if they don't all die.
Over 11,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

There Is No Science

Robin Hanson
Sep 17, 2009
Share this post

There Is No Science

www.overcomingbias.com
23
Share

Eric Falkenstein:

I like listening to journalists talk about science … most of the translation to outsiders comes from non-scientists simply because there are more of them, and some write very well.  Yet, I find many times, when these journalists digress from a specific subject, to science in general they are extremely naive or duplicitous. If you go to The Skeptic’s Guide to the Universe, you invariably hear a bunch of caricatures of those who disagree with conventional wisdom on science—most of which truly are quacks, but not always—and they pedantically emphasize how these alternative views are ‘not science’: they have beliefs that do not have peer-reviewed tests supporting a falsifiable hypothesis. …

When journalists talk about science in general this is usually a pretext for saying those who disagree with their favorite idea are wrong, because they are unscientific. … They then caricature their opponents, taking the most inarticulate advocates from the other side, and skewering their illogic. They then sit back and take take inordinate pride in their scientific pretensions, as if their selective discussion was objective. The fact is, most ‘big’ scientific issues do not conform to the scientific method, where one puts out testable hypotheses, rejecting ones that are falsified.

He’s right: “science” basically means “study”, and there just is no simple way for outsiders to tell who is studying something well.  The best way to study a subject depends a lot on the details of that subject.  We have a few rough guides to expertise, such as careful language, formalism, attention to detail, years of study, IQ, cleanliness, endorsement by respected folks, etc., but there is no surefire ‘science’ checklist that can tell outsiders if research is good.

Share this post

There Is No Science

www.overcomingbias.com
23
Share
23 Comments
Share this discussion

There Is No Science

www.overcomingbias.com
duckpuddler
May 15

Aphorism of the Day:

The problem with science is that there's really no science to it.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
Overcoming Bias Commenter
May 15

Here is a perfect example of a very ambiguous enterprise

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

It has all the trappings of a free energy scam, except for a few things.

a) According to the New York Times, they have raised 60 million dollars from respected CEOs with degrees in Chemical Engineering

b) They seem to have had independent verification from a university lab

c) They seem to have already made deals to license the technology to power plants

Yet, everything they are proposing contradicts fundamental rules of Quantum Mechanics, and they have a number of scientists who reject their claims outright.

As a layperson, I have absolutely no way of knowing if this is a huge crackpot scheme. The company's papers and the papers that have attempted to refute them are using physics that is far beyond my comprehension.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
21 more comments...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Robin Hanson
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing