In 1993 I started grad school in social science at Caltech, after being out of school for nine years. But going back to school wasn’t the only option I had considered. My good friend and mentor Eric Drexler, whose book Engines of Creation had put the nanotech concept on the world’s table, was a fan of my work on "idea futures," now known as "prediction markets." Eric is a good writer; he had helped me hone my idea futures papers writing, and he was encouraging me to write a popular book on the subject. I didn’t have anywhere near Eric’s contacts to help me sell my book, but with Eric’s help I might have had a decent chance at writing an engaging popular book on idea futures.
But I choose to go back to school, instead of writing a book. I was 34, near the limit of how old a student can be to be accepted and seriously considered for an academic career. I wanted to make a break from my software career to work on my ideas full time, but I had doubts about how far I could get with just a book and no other credentials. I was worried that there were relevant things I didn’t understand about idea futures, and I wanted to pursue other related social institution ideas.
It turns out that there was a whole lot I didn’t understand about social science, and by going to school I managed to find a career where I can think about ideas at least half time. But now as I finally start to write my first book, I see it will probably never be clear to me whether I made the right choice.
Robin,
I apologize for being probably too harsh. However, my bet is that starting a successful prediction market back then would have been more effective than writing about the relatively few that were about, but I could be wrong.
Sounds like you are planning to write an overly academically serious book rather than one of these that will be vying to outsell Freakonomics. Shucks, and you could have gone all tabloid about your sufferings with the Congress and Paul Wolfowitz!
Nick, I wonder if I could have helped jump-start the prediction market fad 15 years earlier. Now my book will not be on that topic, but on disagreement.