I’m told that soldiers act a lot more confident and brave when they are far from battle, relative to when it looms immediate in front of them.
When presented with descriptions of how most citizens of Nazi Germany didn’t resist or oppose the regime much, most people claim they would have done different. Which of course is pretty unlikely for most of them. But there’s an obvious explanation of this “social desirability bias”. Their subconscious expects a larger positive payoff from presenting an admirable view of themselves to associates, relative to the smaller negative payoff from making themselves more likely to actually do what they said, should they actually find themselves in a Nazi regime.
When the covid pandemic first appeared, elites and experts voiced their long-standing position that masks and travel restrictions were not effective in a pandemic. Which let them express their pro-inclusive global-citizen liberal attitudes. Their subconscious foresaw only a small chance that they’d actually face a real and big pandemic. And if that ever happened, they could and did lower the cost of this previous attitude by just suddenly and without explanation changing their minds.
For many decades it has been an article of faith among a large fraction of these same sort of experts and elites that advanced aliens must be peaceful egalitarian eco-friendly non-expansionist powers, who would if they saw us scold and lecture us about our wars, nukes, capitalism, expansion, and eco-damage. Like our descendants are presented to be in Star Trek or the Culture novels.
Because in this scenario aliens would be the highest status creatures around, and it is important to these humans that the highest in status agree with their politics. I confidently predict that their attitudes would quickly change if they were actually confronted with unknown but very real alien powers nearby.
This predictable hypocrisy could be exposed if people would back these beliefs with bets. But of course they don’t. They aren’t exactly sure why, but most just feel “uncomfortable” with that. Visible and open betting market odds that disagreed with them would also expose this hypocrisy, but most such also oppose allowing those, mostly also for vague “uncomfortable” reasons. Their unconscious knows better what are those reasons, but knows also not to tell.
Some airliners already do have tail cameras: https://simpleflying.com/ai...
If resisting travel bans at the start of the pandemic was about signaling pro inclusiveness blobal citizen values why did NZ and Australia - two of the most immigrant friendly global citizen oriented countries in the world - start restricting travel in Jan 2019 and then quickly got more strict over the following months?
I think it's more likely that most countries just weren't alert enough from a testing point of view early on, and once it became clear how much virus was present everyone thought "well it's already here so what good is a travel ban".
I rememder you arguing against pretty much every restriction anyone thought of back then. And now you're criticising the same people you were critizing back then for thinking of restriction, but now it's for not promoting some other restriction. Yes, tag the article with "hypocrisy".
PS: I agree - have more betting.