Overcoming Bias

Share this post

Physicists Held To Lower Standard

www.overcomingbias.com

Discover more from Overcoming Bias

This is a blog on why we believe and do what we do, why we pretend otherwise, how we might do better, and what our descendants might do, if they don't all die.
Over 13,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

Physicists Held To Lower Standard

Robin Hanson
Nov 25, 2008
Share this post

Physicists Held To Lower Standard

www.overcomingbias.com
39
Share

In August I complained about vague LHC forecasts.  My oped based on that post just appeared in Symmetry, "A joint Fermilab/SLAC publication."  Its blurb: "Today’s LHC forecasts are no easier to score than the typical horoscope."  It ends:

But geez – the LHC costs more than $10 billion of public money. Shouldn’t we expect big-shot physicists who hope to crow to the public about LHC vindication to express their predictions in a more scoreable form? We don’t accept less from weather, business, or sport forecasters; why accept less from physicists?

My implicit answer: we hold physicists to lower standards.  As I posted two years ago:

Consider how differently the public treats physics and economics.   Physicists can say that this week they think the universe has eleven dimensions, three of which are purple, and two of which are twisted clockwise, and reporters will quote them unskeptically, saying "Isn’t that cool!"   But if economists say, as they have for centuries, that a minimum wage raises unemployment, reporters treat them skeptically and feel they need to find a contrary quote to "balance" their story.

That same Symmetry issue says:

Leon Lederman, a 1988 Nobel laureate and Fermilab physicist, plopped a folding table and two chairs on a busy New York City street corner and sat under colorful hand-scrawled signs offering to answer physics questions.  Even in a city of people too busy for impromptu sidewalk conversations, the sight was too tempting to resist. … Soon about 20 people formed a line down the block. They asked Lederman about the strong force, time and space, fusion, and even time travel. Some asked follow-up questions to get a clearer understanding, while others just seemed thrilled at the chance to meet a Nobel Prize winner.

I’ll bet none told Lederman he was wrong.  Imagine how a Nobel-winning economist would be received. 

Share this post

Physicists Held To Lower Standard

www.overcomingbias.com
39
Share
39 Comments
Share this discussion

Physicists Held To Lower Standard

www.overcomingbias.com
Overcoming Bias Commenter
May 15

Humans evolved brains to argue about who gets what. They argue economics in an attempt to alter public opinion in their favour. This applies to physics far less.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
Overcoming Bias Commenter
May 15

What would happen if a Fields medalist mathematician set up in the street?He would be ignored.

Why? Because math is hard, and doesn't pander to the "layman".

Take out the contributions of mathematicians and neither physics nor economics would have much left but talk.

" They aren't called branes, they are called submanifolds--and we in differential geometry have been exploring their properties for more than a century."

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
37 more comments...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Robin Hanson
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing