10 Comments

Back then, lots of productive workers had their lives on the line. This time, it is just a tiny number of the already-sick and very elderly. It seems unlikely that the economy will miss their productive efforts very much. So: it seems like a very different situation.

Expand full comment

Stock markets throughout the world started going down around the end of Feb and stopped going down around the time the strictest restrictions were introduced. Isn't that a market vote for restrictions?

Expand full comment

I mentioned "cell-phone based data"

Expand full comment

I don't understand how to measure strictness if a country has no official lockdown at all but the people behave as if it does. And of course everything in between. The US has officially stricter lockdown than many places but in practice is more lenient than many others. Also how do you factor in travel restrictions. The Germans restricted travel from Italy, but there were no restrictions on travel from NYC to anywhere in the US. Do we measure by average behavior or worst unpunished outliers?

Expand full comment

Tangential: An MIT Sloan School study whose title suggests stricter distancing tied to faster economic recovery post-1918

https://mitsloan.mit.edu/id...

Expand full comment

But you won't get enough working users.

Expand full comment

Might still get decent results if you do all this with pretend money

Expand full comment

Might get decent info from a fake market if you got enough users

Expand full comment

Yeah, fixed.

Expand full comment

participants capable of learning something about how such decisions outcomes

Is there supposed to be a word between "decisions" and "outcomes"?

Expand full comment