Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

What happened to mixed strategies and diminishing return ?

I don't think that the donors/investors should put all their resource on the climate change problem, or all on the malaria problem, or all on the malnutrition one.

A balanced "portfolio" is always best. On this I think all GWB (the Global Warming Believers, I mean) that have overcome their bias would agree, as would those of the anti-GWB that have overcome _their_ bias.

Expand full comment
Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

Hi Stuart:

I think we have made excellent progress.We agree that if the cost/benefit analysis is correct, and they do not benefit from the extra funding you expect, then they will go for the options with the highest cost/benefit ratios.

The whole exchange with you has been helpful in clarifying several matters for me. Thanks very much.

Expand full comment
43 more comments...

No posts