Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

I think there are too many variables here. For example, look at vitamin E. It turns out that natural mixed tocopherols combined with ascorbates are helpful, while a racemic mix of alpha tocopherol increases mortality by 'crowding out' other useful forms of vitamin E.

Who wins that bet?

Better to just bet on processes for producing resveratrol, or have a futures market in Japanese Knotweed or something. Or what if resveratrol is healthy, but they find a way to alter it so that it doesn't interfere with the cytochrome system, so that people taking statin drugs can still take it. And then some people choose to take the old kind since some benefits actually turn out to hinge upon cytrochrome inactivation. (yes, I know that the primary effect is from p53 inactivation)

When it comes down to it, I place little faith in the wisdom of crowds here. Have you seen the garbage people eat now? And don't get me started on their exercise habits.

Expand full comment
Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

Dear Hopefully Anonymous,

Your wrote "I'm curious if you've thought about ways to influence other conservative republican opinion-shapers into advancing agendas that benefit those of us who don't want to die -agendas that are arguably in their own interest."

See

http://www.tcsdaily.com/art...

http://techcentralstation.c...

http://jamesdmiller.blogspo...

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?