Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Thomas P. Gootee's avatar

Interesting article and comments, Robin. Thank you. It came up as the first result, when I did a google search for "defeating anti-UFO bias". I performed that search, just now, to start to try to figure out how to best publicize my new book, "ET Faces", in which I present some of the thousands of the ETs' self-portraits and other face artworks that I have discovered, in NASA and ESA space telescope images.-This is a really-huge discovery but it turns out that if no one knows about it, nothing happens! So I now need to somehow get the word out. (Any suggestions would be much-appreciated.)-Since you are probably curious to see some of the images that I found: When looking at the book's page, on Amazon, the "Look Inside the Book" link, just above the book's cover image at the upper left, should enable you to look at the sample images, in the book. I will try to post the URL and then also an image of a screen of sample images, below. If the URL doesn't work, for some reason, you should be able to go to amazon and search for either 'Thomas P. Gootee' or 'ET Faces'.-https://www.amazon.com/dp/B...-https://uploads.disquscdn.c...

Expand full comment
Tom Hart's avatar

When I look at deep sea fish, those fish feel alien; they behave in ways I do not expect and have an appearance I do not expect. I would expect extraterrestrials and interdimensional travellers to be alien to me in the way deep sea fish are alien. The objects in the videos are not alien like that; ergo, these objects are human, but some advanced type of human technology. They feel and behave like human objects, but like human objects that move faster than other objects I have encountered; but they do not move or behave in ways that feel alien or inhuman.

The videos date from 2004 and were illegally circulated in the mid-2000s. The US government declassified the videos in 2020; that’s 16 years. To me, it’s the length of time that would be sufficient for later iterations of the same craft to have been developed and those versions captured on video in 2004 to be irrelevant so far as secrecy goes. Based on this, I suggest that the objects are experimental US military vehicles of a design now surpassed—hence it was safe to declassify these old videos this year.

Counterpoint: there is a secret human organisation that has developed these devices independently of any government. The organisation usually suggested is a remanent of the Nazis, based in Antarctica. To me, this feels like a coping strategy on the part of the people who would prefer the Nazis to have won the war—although it also appeals to people who are frightened of the Nazis and their demonic potential, since the Nazis are secular demons for us. It is unlikely: if ruthless Nazis had such advanced weapons, why not use these wonder weapons to bring their old foes to their knees? It makes no sense.

If the devices were built by some other “third force”, why haven’t they capitalised on their immense financial potential or undertaken world domination?

Conclusion: experimental US military device, now rendered obsolete by sixteen years of technical advance.

Expand full comment
53 more comments...

No posts