Overcoming Bias

Share this post

More 2D Values

www.overcomingbias.com

Discover more from Overcoming Bias

This is a blog on why we believe and do what we do, why we pretend otherwise, how we might do better, and what our descendants might do, if they don't all die.
Over 11,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

More 2D Values

Robin Hanson
Aug 21, 2012
Share this post

More 2D Values

www.overcomingbias.com
6
Share

Back in ’09 I posted on the 2D map of values from the World Values Survey, and how nations are distributed in that 2D space. A related 2D space of values is detailed in this new JPSP paper. Apparently 19 different values fall naturally on a circle:

Here are more detailed descriptions of these values:

  • Self-direction–thought: Freedom to cultivate one’s own ideas and abilities

  • Self-direction–action: Freedom to determine one’s own actions

  • Stimulation: Excitement, novelty, and change

  • Hedonism: Pleasure and sensuous gratification

  • Achievement: Success according to social standards

  • Power–dominance: Power through exercising control over people

  • Power–resources: Power through control of material and social resources

  • Face: Security and power through maintaining one’s public image and avoiding

  • humiliation

  • Security–personal: Safety in one’s immediate environment

  • Security–societal: Safety and stability in the wider society

  • Tradition: Maintaining and preserving cultural, family, or religious traditions

  • Conformity–rules: Compliance with rules, laws, and formal obligations

  • Conformity–interpersonal: Avoidance of upsetting or harming other people

  • Humility: Recognizing one’s insignificance in the larger scheme of things

  • Benevolence–dependability: Being a reliable and trustworthy member of the ingroup

  • Benevolence–caring: Devotion to the welfare of ingroup members

  • Universalism–concern: Commitment to equality, justice, and protection for all people

  • Universalism–nature: Preservation of the natural environment

  • Universalism–tolerance: Acceptance and understanding of those who are different from oneself

Of course since they are based on surveys, these are probably mostly about values as seen in a far-view.

Added 21Aug: The upper values on the circle are those celebrated more by richer societies like ours, relative to poorer societies like our farmer ancestors. (Foragers were more in the middle.) In older societies, the upper values are also more celebrated by the rich. The left-side more-community-oriented are also more common in the “East,” which I’ve suggested were centrally located places more often conquered by invaders. The more peripheral “West” tended more to emphasize right-side family and individual values.

Added 24 Aug: Far mode emphasizes the positive over the negative, and the social over the personal. So the upper left area of the circle are the most far values, and the lower right the most near values. This also seems to map onto the (near) things that we actually want, and the (far) things we want others to think that we want.

Share this post

More 2D Values

www.overcomingbias.com
6
Share
6 Comments
Share this discussion

More 2D Values

www.overcomingbias.com
Overcoming Bias Commenter
May 15

There's nothing natural about them fitting on the circle. Someone just decided they wanted a "put words on a circle" model, called a circumplex.

Circumplex models are descriptively shallow: the facets of human preferences simply aren't generated by varying an angle parameter. (Neither are emotions of personality traits. If the circumplex model was cast out from psychology today, it would not be soon enough.) Circumplex models are even poor as mere clustering methods. They're extremely low dimensional and they enforce a constraint that factors be adjacent to two others, which is never motivated.

I also don't like the idea of placing a nation on the circumplex. Schwartz selected his factors to be cultural universals, with countries having profiles of relative reliance on all the different facets. But I understand your need to squeeze the theory down until it looks like a data point of support or disconfirmation for your endlessly applicable theory of near-far construal levels.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
Overcoming Bias Commenter
May 15

Are countries points, clouds, pie slices, or something else?

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
4 more comments...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Robin Hanson
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing