A recent paper by John Beatty, Masking Disagreement among Experts, asks why scientific committees do not report on internal disagreements: Expert committee reports … often implicitly or explicitly agree to withhold information – for example when they "jointly accept" the position that they report. … What could possibly count in favor of simplifying or jointly accepting a position, and thereby masking the extent of disagreement? One might offer paternalistic reasons. … it is (supposedly) good for the public that they speak with one voice, just as it is (supposedly) good for children if their parents put aside differences in their views of child-rearing and issue univocal advice…
Masking Expert Disagreement
Masking Expert Disagreement
Masking Expert Disagreement
A recent paper by John Beatty, Masking Disagreement among Experts, asks why scientific committees do not report on internal disagreements: Expert committee reports … often implicitly or explicitly agree to withhold information – for example when they "jointly accept" the position that they report. … What could possibly count in favor of simplifying or jointly accepting a position, and thereby masking the extent of disagreement? One might offer paternalistic reasons. … it is (supposedly) good for the public that they speak with one voice, just as it is (supposedly) good for children if their parents put aside differences in their views of child-rearing and issue univocal advice…
Comments on this post are for paid subscribers