A recent study … explores the correlation of various occupations and rates of separation and divorce. … Dancers and choreographers registered the highest divorce rates (43.1 percent), followed by bartenders (38.4 percent) and massage therapists (38.2 percent). Also in the top 10 were casino workers, telephone operators, nurses and home health aides. Three types of engineers — agricultural, sales and nuclear engineers — were represented among the 10 occupations with the lowest divorce rates. Also reporting low marital breakup rates were optometrists (4 percent), clergy (5.6 percent) and podiatrists (6.8 percent). (
Atico Export offers technical educational lab equipment / instruments for school, college and teaching labs including thermodynamics, fluid, mass transfer click more
Women who work male-dominated jobs are more likely to divorce because they are always around men other than their husbands. Men, be careful of marrying female soldiers, firefighters, or cops, example. They're most likely to cheat on their husbands because they're working with other men.
And being artistic, yes artists and designers are more likely to divorce because they collaborate with others and have many clients. Something I know, the guy I'm with will want me to give up if he can't trust me.
I can see why railroad workers are on this list. I have been dating a railroad worker for a couple years now and let me just say, I would never marry him. Ladies, be very careful when you date a man that works for the railroad. I was warned and have since heard alot of comments from women with first hand experience or close to someone with or has heard. Railroad men work alot of hours, but their day/night can be cut very short and you will never know unless they tell you. They may get done with their work 4 hours early and be let go early, while you are sitting at home thinking they are still at work, when NO they are out fooling around. Or they may lie and tell you, I had to stay late and not show up at home until the wee hours in the morning, but they got off 4 hours early and have been out fooling around all night. So, it's not just about the long hours, its about the platform they have to use to lie and cheat. My BF works from 4-12. If he has to do overtime, he can be at work until 4 in the morning. If he gets off at 9, I would never know unless I call him or he calls me and even then, he could very well be lieing about where he is or what time he got off. I have heard that in previous relationships this was in issue with him. So, I don't put it past him to try the same with me. There has been many times when I call him and he says, "oh I just got off, me and the guys stopped to have a drink." Oh really, you just got off? Now even though I can hear the guys laughing and talking in the background, it's the point of you being off of work early and I'm sitting at home thinking you are at work. I guess it boils down to trust, but like I said, I know that this was an issue in previous relationships. Like I said, I would never marry this guy.
I can testify to the high divorce rate for a massage therapist. My ex-wife was very intriqued when one of her male clients would get an errection during a massage. How tough do you think it would be to take a guy to that place if she wanted that. I even heard her tell a client to not feel embarrassed if that happened during a massage because that was her favorate part about giving a massage. As one would expect I came home to find her giving him a happy ending a making aragement to screw him on futher visits.
No, the listing is somewhat illuminating. For instance, it is quite strange that the divorce costs for mathematicians usually do not group with those of physicists/astronomers. In reality a whole lot of people today have already picked up this salient position, that is why it feels so important to your dialogue, despite mathematicians obtaining an general reduced divorce rate.
My only explanation for this anomaly is the fact that skilled pure mathematicians have a tendency for being inventive kinds, usually they’re quite extremely strung (like other artists). Most seem to think of mathematics as some type of research, wherever it actually isn’t like other sciences in any respect. It definitely demands lots of imagination and inventive contemplating; a good deal of people today don’t genuinely see that considering most are only familiar with mathematics at faculty/school stage – which can be a terrible analogy for “true” mathematics as it truly is carried out by performing mathematicians.
Another point I’d like to position out is always that many people seem to be to get implying that these divorcees are observed as “attractive” by possible rivals to their spouses. Exactly where are they drawing this from? It’s not a offered that these men and women divorced because of an affair – and also if they did perhaps they ended up being not the ones who ended up being disloyal.
No, the listing is somewhat illuminating. For example, it is very strange that the divorce rates for mathematicians do not group with those of physicists/astronomers. In fact a lot of people have already picked up this salient point, which is why it feels so important to the discussion, despite mathematicians having an overall low divorce rate.
My only explanation for this anomaly is that professional pure mathematicians tend to be creative types, often they're quite highly strung (like other artists). Most seem to think of mathematics as some type of science, where it really isn't like other sciences at all. It really requires a lot of imagination and creative thinking; a lot of people don't really see that since most are only familiar with mathematics at school/college level - which is a terrible analogy for "real" mathematics as it is carried out by working mathematicians.
Another thing I'd like to point out is that many people seem to be implying that these divorcees are seen as "attractive" by potential rivals to their spouses. Where are they drawing this from? It's not a given that these people divorced because of an affair - and even if they did maybe they were not the ones who were cheating.
The data is being interpreted wrongly and the professions listed by the author as high and low divorce rates are not correct. The table is sorted by RATIO TO PREDICTED
If the table is sorted by ACTUAL DIVORCE RATE then the top five are:
507. Clergy (6%)508. Transit and railroad police (5%)509. Optometrists (4%)510. Agricultural engineers (2%)511. Media and communication equipment workers (0%)
I don't recall seeing anything about numbers in this study. How many people in the various jobs or professions were surveyed?Also, some important professions appear to be missing. I have read statistics which say that police officers have high divorce rates but I do not see them listed. I expect that in the social circles of churches, divorce would be frowned upon, therefore people would be under more social pressure to stay with their spouse. This would be particularly true of clergy. It doesn't necessarily mean that the marriages are happy or successful.
Not an interesting study. This is an observational study, not an experiment. People that choose to work at one type of job (say one with higher divorce rates) are different in many ways from those that don't. This is basic comparative science (Statistics)... you can't say that Job A is "(more likely to) cause" divorce than Job B, when the people in Job A differ systematically from those in Job B.
For the same reason, it took decades for scientists to conclude forcefully that smoking "causes" cancer in humans: people that smoke have different diets, different lifestyle habits, different sleeping habits... it's hard to conclude that smoking causes the difference in cancer rates until you spend lots of time and energy "adjusting" for the confounding factors. That obviously can't have been done in this case.
cant help but feel that the rankings would be almost identical if the professions were ranked on a scale of median political leanings from liberal at the top to conservative at the bottom..
In my experience, engineers are very likely to be married and to have significantly more children than people with pure science degrees. Not sure why this is so---maybe it has something to do with tenure track/publish or perish or the fact that a Bachelors is a perfectly adequate working degree, as is a Masters in the various engineering fields?In the little band of engineers I work with, all but one are married and the average number of children among the married is a little north of 2. Most are Phd's, with a few with Masters degrees.
Autism-spectrum people are likely to be mathematicians, true, but they are also significantly more likely than average to be engineers, or natural scientists who work mostly in theory, or people who work with computer systems, but the chart shows that the professions that attract autistics are all over the map, not all hovering near the top (in the bottom 20 I can see 4 or 5 sorts of engineers, "nuclear technicians" and "computer hardware engineers" also near the bottom, etc.)
When you take into account that autistic individuals, relatively rare as they are, are mostly not likely to ever be married (I don't know the exact figure but I recall something like 30% for men and 33% for women, since even intelligent capable independent individuals like Temple Grandin have too much trouble to want to start relationships) I think its pretty unlikely that ASD or Asperger Syndrome types are much affecting these numbers.
The high likelihood jobs share the characteristic of having irregular hours in many cases. Shift work in particular is associated with ill health and stress ion anycase and presumaly disrupts family life while anyone who has ever worked in catering, well, its a free for all.
Mathematics is deeply emotional for many. Good mathematicians solve problems no one could solve before -- this is usually an act of creativity, rather than knowledge or smarts. There are many smart people who can't seem to solve previously unsolved problems.
Mathematicians rank high in suicide as well, up there with artists & dentists.
Atico Export offers technical educational lab equipment / instruments for school, college and teaching labs including thermodynamics, fluid, mass transfer click more
Women who work male-dominated jobs are more likely to divorce because they are always around men other than their husbands. Men, be careful of marrying female soldiers, firefighters, or cops, example. They're most likely to cheat on their husbands because they're working with other men.
And being artistic, yes artists and designers are more likely to divorce because they collaborate with others and have many clients. Something I know, the guy I'm with will want me to give up if he can't trust me.
I can see why railroad workers are on this list. I have been dating a railroad worker for a couple years now and let me just say, I would never marry him. Ladies, be very careful when you date a man that works for the railroad. I was warned and have since heard alot of comments from women with first hand experience or close to someone with or has heard. Railroad men work alot of hours, but their day/night can be cut very short and you will never know unless they tell you. They may get done with their work 4 hours early and be let go early, while you are sitting at home thinking they are still at work, when NO they are out fooling around. Or they may lie and tell you, I had to stay late and not show up at home until the wee hours in the morning, but they got off 4 hours early and have been out fooling around all night. So, it's not just about the long hours, its about the platform they have to use to lie and cheat. My BF works from 4-12. If he has to do overtime, he can be at work until 4 in the morning. If he gets off at 9, I would never know unless I call him or he calls me and even then, he could very well be lieing about where he is or what time he got off. I have heard that in previous relationships this was in issue with him. So, I don't put it past him to try the same with me. There has been many times when I call him and he says, "oh I just got off, me and the guys stopped to have a drink." Oh really, you just got off? Now even though I can hear the guys laughing and talking in the background, it's the point of you being off of work early and I'm sitting at home thinking you are at work. I guess it boils down to trust, but like I said, I know that this was an issue in previous relationships. Like I said, I would never marry this guy.
I can testify to the high divorce rate for a massage therapist. My ex-wife was very intriqued when one of her male clients would get an errection during a massage. How tough do you think it would be to take a guy to that place if she wanted that. I even heard her tell a client to not feel embarrassed if that happened during a massage because that was her favorate part about giving a massage. As one would expect I came home to find her giving him a happy ending a making aragement to screw him on futher visits.
No, the listing is somewhat illuminating. For instance, it is quite strange that the divorce costs for mathematicians usually do not group with those of physicists/astronomers. In reality a whole lot of people today have already picked up this salient position, that is why it feels so important to your dialogue, despite mathematicians obtaining an general reduced divorce rate.
My only explanation for this anomaly is the fact that skilled pure mathematicians have a tendency for being inventive kinds, usually they’re quite extremely strung (like other artists). Most seem to think of mathematics as some type of research, wherever it actually isn’t like other sciences in any respect. It definitely demands lots of imagination and inventive contemplating; a good deal of people today don’t genuinely see that considering most are only familiar with mathematics at faculty/school stage – which can be a terrible analogy for “true” mathematics as it truly is carried out by performing mathematicians.
Another point I’d like to position out is always that many people seem to be to get implying that these divorcees are observed as “attractive” by possible rivals to their spouses. Exactly where are they drawing this from? It’s not a offered that these men and women divorced because of an affair – and also if they did perhaps they ended up being not the ones who ended up being disloyal.
Too much speculation.
No, the listing is somewhat illuminating. For example, it is very strange that the divorce rates for mathematicians do not group with those of physicists/astronomers. In fact a lot of people have already picked up this salient point, which is why it feels so important to the discussion, despite mathematicians having an overall low divorce rate.
My only explanation for this anomaly is that professional pure mathematicians tend to be creative types, often they're quite highly strung (like other artists). Most seem to think of mathematics as some type of science, where it really isn't like other sciences at all. It really requires a lot of imagination and creative thinking; a lot of people don't really see that since most are only familiar with mathematics at school/college level - which is a terrible analogy for "real" mathematics as it is carried out by working mathematicians.
Another thing I'd like to point out is that many people seem to be implying that these divorcees are seen as "attractive" by potential rivals to their spouses. Where are they drawing this from? It's not a given that these people divorced because of an affair - and even if they did maybe they were not the ones who were cheating.
Too much speculation.
The data is being interpreted wrongly and the professions listed by the author as high and low divorce rates are not correct. The table is sorted by RATIO TO PREDICTED
If the table is sorted by ACTUAL DIVORCE RATE then the top five are:
1. Dancers (43%)2. Bartenders (38%)3. Massage therapists (38%)4. Gaming cage workers (35%)5. Extruding and forming machine setters (33%)
the bottom five are:
507. Clergy (6%)508. Transit and railroad police (5%)509. Optometrists (4%)510. Agricultural engineers (2%)511. Media and communication equipment workers (0%)
I can't believe that the author messed up so bad.
BTW: Mathematicians come in at 311 (19%)
I don't recall seeing anything about numbers in this study. How many people in the various jobs or professions were surveyed?Also, some important professions appear to be missing. I have read statistics which say that police officers have high divorce rates but I do not see them listed. I expect that in the social circles of churches, divorce would be frowned upon, therefore people would be under more social pressure to stay with their spouse. This would be particularly true of clergy. It doesn't necessarily mean that the marriages are happy or successful.
Not an interesting study. This is an observational study, not an experiment. People that choose to work at one type of job (say one with higher divorce rates) are different in many ways from those that don't. This is basic comparative science (Statistics)... you can't say that Job A is "(more likely to) cause" divorce than Job B, when the people in Job A differ systematically from those in Job B.
For the same reason, it took decades for scientists to conclude forcefully that smoking "causes" cancer in humans: people that smoke have different diets, different lifestyle habits, different sleeping habits... it's hard to conclude that smoking causes the difference in cancer rates until you spend lots of time and energy "adjusting" for the confounding factors. That obviously can't have been done in this case.
cant help but feel that the rankings would be almost identical if the professions were ranked on a scale of median political leanings from liberal at the top to conservative at the bottom..
In my experience, engineers are very likely to be married and to have significantly more children than people with pure science degrees. Not sure why this is so---maybe it has something to do with tenure track/publish or perish or the fact that a Bachelors is a perfectly adequate working degree, as is a Masters in the various engineering fields?In the little band of engineers I work with, all but one are married and the average number of children among the married is a little north of 2. Most are Phd's, with a few with Masters degrees.
Autism-spectrum people are likely to be mathematicians, true, but they are also significantly more likely than average to be engineers, or natural scientists who work mostly in theory, or people who work with computer systems, but the chart shows that the professions that attract autistics are all over the map, not all hovering near the top (in the bottom 20 I can see 4 or 5 sorts of engineers, "nuclear technicians" and "computer hardware engineers" also near the bottom, etc.)
When you take into account that autistic individuals, relatively rare as they are, are mostly not likely to ever be married (I don't know the exact figure but I recall something like 30% for men and 33% for women, since even intelligent capable independent individuals like Temple Grandin have too much trouble to want to start relationships) I think its pretty unlikely that ASD or Asperger Syndrome types are much affecting these numbers.
Looking at the spreadsheet, it looks like it is improperly parsed, as there is a number following each occupation and column B is empty.
I'm amused that you seem to be missing the point.
The high likelihood jobs share the characteristic of having irregular hours in many cases. Shift work in particular is associated with ill health and stress ion anycase and presumaly disrupts family life while anyone who has ever worked in catering, well, its a free for all.
Dear R,
Mathematics is deeply emotional for many. Good mathematicians solve problems no one could solve before -- this is usually an act of creativity, rather than knowledge or smarts. There are many smart people who can't seem to solve previously unsolved problems.
Mathematicians rank high in suicide as well, up there with artists & dentists.