12 Comments

right. I don't think his predictions are that crazy.

Expand full comment

The phrase "assuming no important wars and no important increase in population" should be taken into account before people get too excited about pointing out how wrong this vision was.

(for reference, world population in 1930 was two billion)

Expand full comment

The forger and the farmer categories remind me of the grasshopper and the ant fable.

Fertility will be our Achilles heel. The separation of sex and procreation will lead to a population and culture crash.

Expand full comment

We can forgive Keynes for not understanding a couple key economic and social factors that make his predictions worthless. We can't be so kind to those who read him today and make the same wide-eyed mistakes.

Namely:

1) The constraints of thermodynamics.

2) Resource limits.

3) Continued population growth and the disintegration of collective value-dialogue.

Expand full comment

Possible, but it's worth considering what else we know about his thinking on these matters.

Expand full comment

How much is this affected by the very specific timing of being just after the crash? Keynes was a very good speculator, other than being pretty much wiped out in the crash. Did he write on this topic at some other period?

Expand full comment

The last sentence in the essay is the best: ". If economists could manage to get themselves thought of as humble, competent people, on a level with dentists, that would be splendid!"

Expand full comment

If you're referring to the way Keynes mentions usury, then I think that's possible but unlikely. Keynes thought real interest rates would fall to zero in the long run as the supply of loanable funds became more and more abundant relative to investment. So "usury" as he knew it would simply cease to exist as a matter of course.

Expand full comment

I'm pretty sure that the last two paragraphs are mostly just expressions of not very veiled anti-semitism and the earlier parts seem almost perfectly correct and well calibrated.

Expand full comment

Not massively surprising.

Here's a question: what historical figure would you be most interested in reading a vision of the future from?

I'd pick two: Machiavelli and Al Capone.

What kind of person assumes a near mode when asked this question?

Expand full comment