8 Comments
User's avatar
Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

maybe this is what q meant, but it looks like (in family blog-speak) lady bits

you know, like orchids, butterflies, etc.

is this too evo-psych?

Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

Are you saying that the images would be equally beautiful if the color mapping were random?

I took the picture and added a gradient map to it. It's not quite the same as changing the color mapping (or maybe it is, I am not really sure how much information is lost in the conversion to grayscale), but you get the idea: http://img193.imageshack.us...

Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

Err, my comment was supposed to link to a picture of a flame fractal. (I can't find the one that I originally posted.)

Tim Tyler's avatar

Living things are not normally expected to care much about wasting negentropy - unless they are in a confined space where they can't get any more of it.

Normally there are more important things than how much is wasted - namely getting to the negentropy first, and rapid utilisation of it.

Robin Hanson's avatar

Yes of course they can play with the frequency to color map; but they don't play with the angle to frequency map, which is where most of the info in the pict is found.

Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

Hubble: Space Doesn't Really Look Like That! a little about how pictures like this are made.

Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

Did anyone else look at that and think, "Wow, what a waste of negentropy?"

Here's an alternative for those of us who are cheap:

Hmm, that doesn't look quite as pretty somehow. Is it possible that God created this universe just because He needed a new background picture for his desktop?