Discussion about this post

User's avatar
RobinHanson's avatar

I am really well aware of all of that. But one can't put everything one knows into a simple calculation. I claims this calculation shows an essential feature of the situation, even if it doesn't model every detail.

Expand full comment
disqus_TXuE2PF3pw's avatar

You have neglected the fact that stars, and planets, are not homogenous. Small stars predominate and, while long-lived, have narrow orbital zones for habitable planets and often emit dangerous flares. There are also different generations of star systems with different elemental compositions. The first generation of stars consisted of hydrogen and helium, with a small amount of lithium, and were unlikely to have life-bearing planets. The second generation of stars, born from the debris of exploding first-generation stars, have a modicum of heavy elements up to iron; but are deficient in the proportion of such elements as compared to our own solar system, therefore may be less suitable for the evolution of life and technological civilizations. Our sun belongs to the third generation of stars, with a greatly enhanced proportion of heavy elements up to uranium, and is much older than most third-generation stars in our galaxy.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?