Overcoming Bias

Share this post

Future Filter Fatalism

www.overcomingbias.com

Discover more from Overcoming Bias

This is a blog on why we believe and do what we do, why we pretend otherwise, how we might do better, and what our descendants might do, if they don't all die.
Over 11,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

Future Filter Fatalism

Carl Shulman
Dec 22, 2012
Share this post

Future Filter Fatalism

www.overcomingbias.com
45
Share

One of the more colorful vignettes in philosophy is Gibbard and Harper’s “Death in Damascus” case:

Consider the story of the man who met Death in Damascus. Death looked surprised, but then recovered his ghastly composure and said, ‘I am coming for you tomorrow’. The terrified man that night bought a camel and rode to Aleppo. The next day, Death knocked on the door of the room where he was hiding, and said I have come for you’.

‘But I thought you would be looking for me in Damascus’, said the man.

‘Not at all’, said Death ‘that is why I was surprised to see you yesterday. I knew that today I was to find you in Aleppo’.

That is, Death’s foresight takes into account any reactions to Death’s activities.

Now suppose you think that a large portion of the Great Filter lies ahead, so that almost all civilizations like ours fail to colonize the stars. This implies that civilizations almost never adopt strategies that effectively avert doom and allow colonization. Thus the mere fact that we adopt any purported Filter-avoiding strategy S is strong evidence that S won’t work, just as the fact that you adopt any particular plan to escape Death indicates that it will fail.

To expect S to work we would have to be very confident that we were highly unusual in adopting S (or any strategy as good as S), in addition to thinking S very good on the merits. This burden might be met if it was only through some bizarre fluke that S became possible, and a strategy might improve our chances even though we would remain almost certain to fail, but common features, such as awareness of the Great Filter, would not suffice to avoid future filters.

Share this post

Future Filter Fatalism

www.overcomingbias.com
45
Share
45 Comments
Share this discussion

Future Filter Fatalism

www.overcomingbias.com
lump1
May 15

Nah, humans are too fragile, high-maintenance and shortlived. I think it's quite possible that no (biological) human being will ever survive an interstellar trip, the minimum requirement for a Von Neumann machine. Our strength has traditionally been the self-reproduction once we arrive at our destination. Machines have a while to go before they match us in that regard.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
Locaha
May 15

 Humans are Von Neumann machines.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
43 more comments...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Robin Hanson
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing