Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lord's avatar

If the star is a million light years away, I have doubts even of the former. What is more difficult, traveling to a world, terraforming a world, or evolving life adapted to a world in that time? What if the former makes no sense without the latter? If possible, why hasn't life already evolved the capability to do so? Or has it and we are the result? Would any possibility of colonization already be occupied? Why would you chose to produce humans if you could produce factories, assuming factories have some capability of sex and selection? Would we have any interest in seeding distant stars with our ancestors from a million years ago? We view space, time, form, and environment as independent but what if they are closely interrelated?

Expand full comment
Lord's avatar

If the world is more than a million light years distant we should be skeptical. What is more difficult, traveling a million years, terraforming a world in a million years, or adapting to a world in a million years? What if all are necessary? What if none? We think of space, time, environment, and adaptation as independent but what if they are not? If we could build and transfer factories, why would we build and transfer anything other than factories? Would we have any interest is transferring a progenitor from a million years ago elsewhere?

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?