Discover more from Overcoming Bias
When you donate to a charity, you not only give them resources to further their aims, you also affiliate with others who donate to the same charity. Because of this, you might not donate to a charity you otherwise like because you dislike other donors. And because of that, charities may refuse donations from disliked people.
Think that doesn’t apply to you? If you donate to Planned Parenthood, they think it applies to you – they refused a $500,000 donation by Tucker Max. Why? Because:
PP: “I guess it’s the way you write about women.”
Tucker “What do you mean? I’m not negative towards women in my writing. Women love my writing; more than half my fans are female.”
PP: “Well…there are certain jokes you make we feel can be perceived in a certain negative manner.”
Tucker: “So because I made a fat girl joke you won’t accept a $500,000 donation?”
PP: “I wouldn’t characterize it that way.”
Tucker: “How would you then? I’m listening and I want your best quote.”
PP: “We don’t feel it would be appropriate, given Planned Parenthood’s mission and your body of work, to accept your donation.”
Tucker: “What? I thought Planned Parenthood’s mission was about helping women, not passing judgment on humor.” (more)
It seems Planned Parenthood thinks that by accepting Tucker’s large donation they would discourage even more donations by others.
Would you refuse to donate to a charity because someone you disliked had also donated? What if you could be assured this donor had no influence on what the charity did with its money?
Donors Affiliate
Robin, I think your post is wildly flawed in not mentioning that Tucker offered PP $500,000 on the condition that they name an abortion clinic after him. That piece of information changes everything.
One thing people are leaving out: Planned Parenthood may have their own reasons for discouraging the kinds of remarks Tucker makes if they feel it contributes to misogyny - not accepting a donation is a way of socially ostracizing him for his remarks as an incentive to others, and simultaneously a way for PP to signal that they are principled.