Discover more from Overcoming Bias
This is a blog on why we believe and do what we do, why we pretend otherwise, how we might do better, and what our descendants might do, if they don't all die.
Over 11,000 subscribers
Continue reading
There’s a tension between (a) wanting to believe that people who disagree with us aren’t so smart or successful and (b) wanting to believe that our opponents are successful because of external factors such as wealth, social status, and rhetorical ability. Liberals as well as conservatives can be torn, I think, between (a) thinking of their political opponents as pitiful losers, and (b) resenting the other side for having all sorts of unearned advantages.
That is Andrew Gelman, recommended by TGGP. Naturally die-hard disagreers presume their opponents are both stupid and witty/well-connected.
Disagreer’s Dilemna
It's a cliche that political parties blame their opponents for being both stupid and evil.
I don't see a tension between the two ideas at all. People use both of them often in the same sentence and without any apparent mental conflict over it.