Overcoming Bias

Share this post

Development Futures

www.overcomingbias.com

Discover more from Overcoming Bias

This is a blog on why we believe and do what we do, why we pretend otherwise, how we might do better, and what our descendants might do, if they don't all die.
Over 11,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

Development Futures

Robin Hanson
Nov 19, 2007
Share this post

Development Futures

www.overcomingbias.com
20
Share

Over the last month I’ve sketched how decision markets might inform choices in marriage, college, college admissions, and medical treatment.  Today I consider development, i.e., advising governments and non-profits trying to improve "developing" nations and societies.  Rick Davies, Michael Strong (here and here), and Robert Hahn and Paul Tetlock have written already about this to varying degrees, but let me say it my way. 

Decision markets are markets where speculators set prices that estimate the consequences of a decision. The big win here would be decision markets estimating envisioned outcomes of proposed development projects.  Imagine that before the World Bank, IMF, or Gates Foundation approved a particular development project, we could learn of the discrete alternatives being considered, and of the measurable outcomes they planned to publish and use to evaluate success or failure.   

For example, there might be several Malaria-reduction projects being proposed, each of which will be evaluated later by the actual rate of Malaria in some area.  AIDS projects might be evaluated via later rates of infection.  Education projects might be evaluated later by literacy rates, while national investment or loan projects might be evaluated on growth rates of GDP.

Development futures could directly evaluate expected outcomes both given that a project was approved, and given that the project was not approved.  The difference between these numbers is the expected effect of the project.  Development futures could tell everyone that the Gates Foundation’s malaria project is not expected to change malaria rates, or that a World Bank loan to Mongolia would dramatically improve growth rates there. 

The cooperation of the Gates Foundation or the World Bank would not be required (beyond revealing projects considered and evaluation criteria).  Any other interested organization could create markets allowing anyone they approved to trade.  Ideally someone would subsidize cash markets where anyone could trade. 

Once development futures had built up a track record of unprecedented accuracy, they could cut through poisonous biases on both sides – to expose both wasteful projects built on wishful thinking, and insincere skepticism used as an excuse to do nothing.  Let’s find out what really works, and then let’s really do it. 

Share this post

Development Futures

www.overcomingbias.com
20
Share
20 Comments
Share this discussion

Development Futures

www.overcomingbias.com
Peter St Onge
May 15

You could sorta kinda get to this today, by bundling futures or ETF's for a given country together with development projects. Some projects could be so useful (say, cleaning up commercial courts) that they could, in theory, be self-funding if bundled with, say, options on ETF's for that country.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
Overcoming Bias Commenter
May 15

Ugh, can I note put links here?

The first case for a microfinance project is the "In defense of usury" WSJ article, about a randomized study of a loan's effect on individuals.

http://research.yale.edu/ka...

The second is a list of anecdotes from Opportunity International.

http://www.opportunity.org/...

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
18 more comments...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Robin Hanson
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing