8 Comments

Massive, visible and rapid technological progress?

Expand full comment

Singularity speed beliefs about rates of progress at most influenced only the last few decades of science fiction - the trend is over 130 years.

Expand full comment

I disagree that it shows less interest in the distant future.

If your timescale for future change is close to that of, say, Kurzweil's, the world is going to be so different in ~200 years that there is nothing for a storyteller to cling to. If the "Mid future" is a transition away from a human-comprehensible civilization, the far future will be very tough to explain to your audience.

Expand full comment

Have to wonder if more is set in the past.

Expand full comment

They say they sampled different types of media. Given that sci-fi TV and movies are mostly recent, that could create significant bias. I'd really like to see the same chart using some more objective ranking, for example the top 10 selling sci-fi novels of each year.

Expand full comment

I'd be most interested in the outlier of the popularity of near-future stories in the 1900s - I wouldn't have been surprised if it were the 1890's and explained it as date-related apocalyptic stories, but what could have made the near future suddenly so interesting in the 1900s?

Expand full comment

website mangled my comment. Partition on 'less than 50' and 'greater than 50'.

Expand full comment

Partition on 50 and it looks like random noise. This is a case of seeing what you want to see.

Expand full comment