I once had a long discussion with Ken Steiglitz about P=NP, while I was still at Princeton. … Ken was and still is sure that P must not be equal to NP. Okay, I said to Ken, what are the odds that they are equal? Ken said that he thought the odds were a million to one. I immediately suggested a bet. I did not ask him to “bet his life,” but I did ask for a million to one bet. I would put up one dollar. If in say ten years P=NP had not been proved, then he would win my dollar. If P=NP was proved in that time frame, then I would win a million dollars from Ken. Ken said no way. After more discussion the best bet I could get out of Ken was to . Two to one. That was the best he would do.

That is from Richard Lipton; hat tip to Michael Nielsen. Does anyone doubt that two to one better summarizes his evidence than a million to one?

**GD Star Rating**

*loading...*

Pingback: Math World | Overcoming Bias : Words Vs. Bets()

Pingback: links « Mike Kenny()