Discussion about this post

User's avatar
gwern's avatar

I would expect it to be less reliable in the sense of omitting citations entirely (especially for stuff that has never been digitized); I'm more puzzled why it's omitting citation counts for citations it clearly does know about because it led me directly to them!

Robin Hanson's avatar

Maybe Google Scholar citation count is less reliable for such old papers.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?