Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

Perhaps out of a genuine fear of the politics of hate and fear? (a bit contradictory I know - "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself") Hate and fear has been used to deprive people of their civil rights and sometimes has lead whole societies into disaster by military misadventure. Hatred and fear of Jews, of kulaks, of capitalists, of Catholics, of Protestants, of "reactionaries" has led to vast numbers of deaths.

Furthermore, that other people are aware of the sometimes disastrous consequences of the politics of hate and fear makes it rhetorically useful to draw implicit comparisons. If I agree with you that, say, the French Revolution's collapse into the Great Terror and then into a military dictatorship was a bad thing, and was driven in part by politics of hate and fear, saying that x is the politics of hate and fear probably increases the odds that I'll start to regard x as a bad thing (unless we're fundamentally opposed).

Expand full comment
Tim Tyler's avatar

Re: "Why do we embrace and accept our own fears and hates, even as we suggest that others’ fears and hates are bad signs about them?"

Fear signalling is often an attempt at manipulation - as in the "crying wolf" story. If someone tells to to be afraid, be very afraid, then you should often look to see what they will get out of this.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?