A decent respect for the opinions of mankind would require them to *listen* to the opinions of mankind, and not just declare their own opinion and reasons. It takes a pretty low threshold of respect to bother to explain your reasons to them; it takes a lot higher threshold to bother to listen to them.

Expand full comment

Could I correctly say that “caring what other people think” can be more precisely defined as accountability?

I've read a variety of studies over the years citing how people respond in certain sized groups; the smaller the group the more pronounced the effect on overall behavior, positive that is.

I'm new to this blog, but I'll read some older posts in a bit, but I don't know that accountability (i.e. caring what you think about me) has to be exclusively moral or intellectual in its nature.

What does spring to mind, is how this relates to natural law, and all of the old questions that brings up. "Is morality objective?" which gets to what is natural in our moral compass, or not natural for that matter. I think the inevitable effect of accountability within groups goes a long way in proving the objectivity of morality.

Expand full comment