You’ll often hear people, including people on this blog, talk about self-deception as a central factor in creating bias. Work from cognitive neuroscience, however, shows that the "self-deception" description doesn’t really capture how deep the issue runs. In this post, I’ll give an analogy that a number of us use these days to describe our understanding of the cognitive architecture of conscious speech. The earliest I can remember using the analogy was in a paper I wrote in the mid/late 90s, and the model behind it drives some of my comments over at Chatty Apes. Jon Haidt gives the analogy in an interview here. Rob Kurzban has a superb new article on it here. Below, I provide the analogy.
-
Subscribe
-
Recent Posts
-
Recent Comments
- John Maxwell IV:
-
Anon:
"It doesn't matter. In the long term our low-birthrate civilization..."
- nazgulnarsil:
-
Mikhail:
"Marriage with 15? Nothing new in the backward societies. Parents..."
-
Thomas Jefferson:
"83% are insured? That sounds about right since the uninsured..."
-
Paul Hewitt:
"This is, by far, the most efficient solution. Under the..."
- Nancy Lebovitz:
- Nancy Lebovitz:
- Edward Gaffney:
-
Kris Chickey:
"What happens in the subsequent generations? When the second generation..."
- Sobre:
-
Chris:
"The problem here is that fluid learning (new skills) gets..."
- nathan:
- Nancy Lebovitz:
- burger flipper:
-
Tony:
"Interesting idea. I agree with curious that I don't trust..."
-
curious:
"
But still, it seems an interesting thing that never was,
..." - Whateva:
- Shae:
-
lxm:
"This week's idea: Health care reform will not reduce ER..."
- nazgulnarsil:
-
TGGP:
"Chris, it's an unproven assumption that people won't sit on..."
- Patri Friedman:
- Michael Bishop:
-
rapscallion:
"i) Continuing my criticisms of efficiency analysis from the prior..."


