<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pondering Panspermia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/11/pondering-panspermia.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/11/pondering-panspermia.html</link>
	<description>Overcoming Bias is economist Robin Hanson’s blog, on honesty, signaling, disagreement, forecasting, and the far future.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:32:05 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Overcoming Bias : Pamspermia Confirmed</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/11/pondering-panspermia.html#comment-436973</link>
		<dc:creator>Overcoming Bias : Pamspermia Confirmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=20294#comment-436973</guid>
		<description>[...] course this doesn&#8217;t directly confirm longer distance panspermia.  SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Pamspermia Confirmed&quot;, url: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course this doesn&#8217;t directly confirm longer distance panspermia.  SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Pamspermia Confirmed&quot;, url: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roko</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/11/pondering-panspermia.html#comment-435557</link>
		<dc:creator>Roko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=20294#comment-435557</guid>
		<description>&quot;This would be worrisome from a Great Filter perspective.&quot; 

Indeed... Very much so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This would be worrisome from a Great Filter perspective.&#8221; </p>
<p>Indeed&#8230; Very much so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Overcoming Bias : Pondering Panspermia -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/11/pondering-panspermia.html#comment-435544</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Overcoming Bias : Pondering Panspermia -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=20294#comment-435544</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Guido Thys, Mercatus Bloggers. Mercatus Bloggers said: Overcoming Bias: Pondering Panspermia: Over the last few days I’ve neglected my duties to obsessively bro.. http://bit.ly/2rRddR [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Guido Thys, Mercatus Bloggers. Mercatus Bloggers said: Overcoming Bias: Pondering Panspermia: Over the last few days I’ve neglected my duties to obsessively bro.. <a href="http://bit.ly/2rRddR" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2rRddR</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AP</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/11/pondering-panspermia.html#comment-435539</link>
		<dc:creator>AP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=20294#comment-435539</guid>
		<description>Yes, but we don&#039;t know whether said life emerged here or came from some outside source. If, as you suggest, life on earth originated elsewhere, then that strongly implies that a few 100My is not long enough for it to emerge (else we wouldn&#039;t need the panspermia hypothesis).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but we don&#8217;t know whether said life emerged here or came from some outside source. If, as you suggest, life on earth originated elsewhere, then that strongly implies that a few 100My is not long enough for it to emerge (else we wouldn&#8217;t need the panspermia hypothesis).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ravi hegde</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/11/pondering-panspermia.html#comment-435537</link>
		<dc:creator>ravi hegde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=20294#comment-435537</guid>
		<description>OK, so you manage to pinpoint the exact point for origin of life. So what? 
Isn&#039;t it far better for us to invest intellectual energy into making something tangible or useful? The point is that most academic curiosities aren&#039;t really useful to society, but merely serve as arbitrary in-group mores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so you manage to pinpoint the exact point for origin of life. So what?<br />
Isn&#8217;t it far better for us to invest intellectual energy into making something tangible or useful? The point is that most academic curiosities aren&#8217;t really useful to society, but merely serve as arbitrary in-group mores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/11/pondering-panspermia.html#comment-435536</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=20294#comment-435536</guid>
		<description>That the simplest living things are rather simple has been hypothesised by many - including Cairns-Smith and S. Kauffman. The idea is compatible with the early emergence of life on Earth.  So, the idea that early life is necessarily complex is a long way from being established - and so represents correspondingly weak evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That the simplest living things are rather simple has been hypothesised by many &#8211; including Cairns-Smith and S. Kauffman. The idea is compatible with the early emergence of life on Earth.  So, the idea that early life is necessarily complex is a long way from being established &#8211; and so represents correspondingly weak evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard silliker</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/11/pondering-panspermia.html#comment-435534</link>
		<dc:creator>richard silliker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=20294#comment-435534</guid>
		<description>Why not?  As good as any, better than most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not?  As good as any, better than most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/11/pondering-panspermia.html#comment-435533</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=20294#comment-435533</guid>
		<description>Only recently have we been capable of leaving behind artifacts that would last more than mere thousands of years - things like nuclear waste or corrosion-resistant materials (like titanium). We&#039;ve also performed major geophysical engineering; Mt Rushmore won&#039;t last forever, but that&#039;d piddly compared to stripping the planet of resources like fossil fuels that a future prospector would expect to find. So if there was sentient life on the planet prior to humans, they certainly didn&#039;t nuke themselves into extinction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only recently have we been capable of leaving behind artifacts that would last more than mere thousands of years &#8211; things like nuclear waste or corrosion-resistant materials (like titanium). We&#8217;ve also performed major geophysical engineering; Mt Rushmore won&#8217;t last forever, but that&#8217;d piddly compared to stripping the planet of resources like fossil fuels that a future prospector would expect to find. So if there was sentient life on the planet prior to humans, they certainly didn&#8217;t nuke themselves into extinction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Hanson</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/11/pondering-panspermia.html#comment-435532</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=20294#comment-435532</guid>
		<description>Some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.panspermia.org/hoover2.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;claim&lt;/a&gt; to have found fossils of life on meteors that are older than Earth.  If such claims were verified, they&#039;d be clear proof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some <a href="http://www.panspermia.org/hoover2.htm" rel="nofollow">claim</a> to have found fossils of life on meteors that are older than Earth.  If such claims were verified, they&#8217;d be clear proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Hanson</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/11/pondering-panspermia.html#comment-435531</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=20294#comment-435531</guid>
		<description>Life appeared on Earth within a few 100My or so after it was possible, and we don&#039;t know it didn&#039;t appear earlier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life appeared on Earth within a few 100My or so after it was possible, and we don&#8217;t know it didn&#8217;t appear earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
