<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Science Cuts Religiosity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/08/social-science-cuts-religiosity.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/08/social-science-cuts-religiosity.html</link>
	<description>Overcoming Bias is economist Robin Hanson’s blog, on honesty, signaling, disagreement, forecasting, and the far future.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:20:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fburnaby</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/08/social-science-cuts-religiosity.html#comment-431445</link>
		<dc:creator>fburnaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=19348#comment-431445</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s ambiguous in the post, but I&#039;m reading this to say that the &lt;em&gt;change&lt;/em&gt; in religiosity after starting college is being reported. But this is very sensitive to initial conditions.

In an absurd extreme case, say major 1 starts out at 0% religiosity, and major 2 at 100%, then they each only have one way to go. A &quot;random-drift model would be biased, showing up. This sensitivity to initial conditions would still exist for intermediate values not equal to 50% (or maybe it&#039;s whatever the equilibrium value is, which presumably is higher than 50%).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s ambiguous in the post, but I&#8217;m reading this to say that the <em>change</em> in religiosity after starting college is being reported. But this is very sensitive to initial conditions.</p>
<p>In an absurd extreme case, say major 1 starts out at 0% religiosity, and major 2 at 100%, then they each only have one way to go. A &#8220;random-drift model would be biased, showing up. This sensitivity to initial conditions would still exist for intermediate values not equal to 50% (or maybe it&#8217;s whatever the equilibrium value is, which presumably is higher than 50%).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taimyoboi</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/08/social-science-cuts-religiosity.html#comment-431374</link>
		<dc:creator>Taimyoboi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=19348#comment-431374</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the explanation is a little more basic.  Religious belief generally invovles believing in absolute truths and morals.  Physical sciences tend to also be non-relativistic at their core. 

Humanities are not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the explanation is a little more basic.  Religious belief generally invovles believing in absolute truths and morals.  Physical sciences tend to also be non-relativistic at their core. </p>
<p>Humanities are not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overcoming Bias : Social Science Cuts Religiosity &#124; kozmom news</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/08/social-science-cuts-religiosity.html#comment-431310</link>
		<dc:creator>Overcoming Bias : Social Science Cuts Religiosity &#124; kozmom news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=19348#comment-431310</guid>
		<description>[...] The rest is here: Overcoming Bias : Social Science Cuts Religiosity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The rest is here: Overcoming Bias : Social Science Cuts Religiosity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Goetz</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/08/social-science-cuts-religiosity.html#comment-431291</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Goetz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 15:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=19348#comment-431291</guid>
		<description>I think the best evidence against religion isn&#039;t evidence against its claims, such as a physical scientist would make; but explaining-away its evidence.

If you investigate religion seriously, you&#039;ll find many, many accounts of very strong empirical evidence of miracles.  You can only dismiss them when you understand how unreliable humans are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the best evidence against religion isn&#8217;t evidence against its claims, such as a physical scientist would make; but explaining-away its evidence.</p>
<p>If you investigate religion seriously, you&#8217;ll find many, many accounts of very strong empirical evidence of miracles.  You can only dismiss them when you understand how unreliable humans are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/08/social-science-cuts-religiosity.html#comment-431282</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 07:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=19348#comment-431282</guid>
		<description>Evidence that &quot;education&quot; is bad for your brain ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evidence that &#8220;education&#8221; is bad for your brain <img src='http://www.overcomingbias.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interessantes woanders (2009.08.09) › Immersion I/O</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/08/social-science-cuts-religiosity.html#comment-431275</link>
		<dc:creator>Interessantes woanders (2009.08.09) › Immersion I/O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=19348#comment-431275</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Science Cuts Religiosity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Science Cuts Religiosity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Maxwell IV</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/08/social-science-cuts-religiosity.html#comment-431267</link>
		<dc:creator>John Maxwell IV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 18:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=19348#comment-431267</guid>
		<description>Do students shift to the left politically in a similar pattern?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do students shift to the left politically in a similar pattern?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattMc</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/08/social-science-cuts-religiosity.html#comment-431262</link>
		<dc:creator>MattMc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 17:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=19348#comment-431262</guid>
		<description>I almost went into philosophy to study theories of ethics and morality that were missing from my rejected religious background. I would guess that the religous avoid those humanities type subjects because they so often directly touch on religion in an analytical way. The sciences really only give you trouble if you are a fundamentalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I almost went into philosophy to study theories of ethics and morality that were missing from my rejected religious background. I would guess that the religous avoid those humanities type subjects because they so often directly touch on religion in an analytical way. The sciences really only give you trouble if you are a fundamentalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyrrell McAllister</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/08/social-science-cuts-religiosity.html#comment-431261</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyrrell McAllister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 17:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=19348#comment-431261</guid>
		<description>But how is it that the &quot;conflicts between the views&quot; have any causal effect?  The most natural answer is they have effects via arguments and evidence:  Arguments grounded in one view decrease the believability of the other view.  Is there a status-signaling account that does away with arguments altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But how is it that the &#8220;conflicts between the views&#8221; have any causal effect?  The most natural answer is they have effects via arguments and evidence:  Arguments grounded in one view decrease the believability of the other view.  Is there a status-signaling account that does away with arguments altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/08/social-science-cuts-religiosity.html#comment-431260</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 17:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overcomingbias.com/?p=19348#comment-431260</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s cool. But do you have a signaling story for evidence/truth? If so, I&#039;m eager to hear it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s cool. But do you have a signaling story for evidence/truth? If so, I&#8217;m eager to hear it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 433/450 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: overcomingbias-assets.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.overcomingbias.com @ 2012-02-11 23:38:41 -->
