<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Fiction Lies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html</link>
	<description>Overcoming Bias is economist Robin Hanson’s blog, on honesty, signaling, disagreement, forecasting, and the far future.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:56:30 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robin Hanson</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389091</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389091</guid>
		<description>Robert, if you can show your friends you are horrified by a plot where the bad guys win, that works also to show your cooperativeness.  If you want to show that you cooperate with a particular group, instead of with the wider world, a story where people help their friends but hurt outsiders can signal your attitudes well.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, if you can show your friends you are horrified by a plot where the bad guys win, that works also to show your cooperativeness.  If you want to show that you cooperate with a particular group, instead of with the wider world, a story where people help their friends but hurt outsiders can signal your attitudes well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389090</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389090</guid>
		<description>Obviously this doesn&#039;t explain lots of literature where deviators are not punished, or punished but ambivalently. The Outsider comes to mind. From my favourite films as well: American Psycho, The Talented Mr Ripley, Clockwork Orange, American Beauty, Three Kings, Match Point.

Admittedly among some people I am embarrassed to admit I like some of these films where the evil are fetishised. Is this a more modern phenomenon? Do antiheroes exist in folk stories?

Have you seen Funny Games? Surely the ultimate example of a movie where the criminals succeed and the good all lose. And horrible to watch for that reason.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously this doesn&#8217;t explain lots of literature where deviators are not punished, or punished but ambivalently. The Outsider comes to mind. From my favourite films as well: American Psycho, The Talented Mr Ripley, Clockwork Orange, American Beauty, Three Kings, Match Point.</p>
<p>Admittedly among some people I am embarrassed to admit I like some of these films where the evil are fetishised. Is this a more modern phenomenon? Do antiheroes exist in folk stories?</p>
<p>Have you seen Funny Games? Surely the ultimate example of a movie where the criminals succeed and the good all lose. And horrible to watch for that reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Hanson</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389089</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389089</guid>
		<description>Bill, yes, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johnderbyshire.com/Reviews/HumanSciences/artinstinct.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;that review&lt;/a&gt; is relevant:&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;The Art Instinct&lt;/i&gt; is at its best in its discussion of fiction. Yes, fiction is instructive:  we all know a lot about nineteenth-century Russia, though none of us has been there. Yes, it helps us strategize our social lives, as Pinker argued. Dutton adds another dimension: fiction hones our mind-reading skills. ... fiction lets us explore other minds ­ the minds both of imagined characters and, at one remove, of authors. That all three of these features are adaptive, is highly plausible.&lt;/blockquote&gt;IMHO, these explanations don&#039;t get very far at explaining why we are interested in fictional worlds with such alien settings, and such different social behavior in those settings.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, yes, <a href="http://www.johnderbyshire.com/Reviews/HumanSciences/artinstinct.html" rel="nofollow">that review</a> is relevant:<br />
<blockquote><i>The Art Instinct</i> is at its best in its discussion of fiction. Yes, fiction is instructive:  we all know a lot about nineteenth-century Russia, though none of us has been there. Yes, it helps us strategize our social lives, as Pinker argued. Dutton adds another dimension: fiction hones our mind-reading skills. &#8230; fiction lets us explore other minds ­ the minds both of imagined characters and, at one remove, of authors. That all three of these features are adaptive, is highly plausible.</p></blockquote>
<p>IMHO, these explanations don&#8217;t get very far at explaining why we are interested in fictional worlds with such alien settings, and such different social behavior in those settings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billswift</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389088</link>
		<dc:creator>billswift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389088</guid>
		<description>John Derbyshire has a review up of a Denis Dutton&#039;s book &quot;The Art Instinct&quot; that addresses these types of problems, that is evolutionary psych arguments about the arts including fiction.

http://www.johnderbyshire.com/Reviews/HumanSciences/artinstinct.html

One of the primary uses of stories by Denis Dutton&#039;s theory is teaching &quot;mind reading&quot; skills.  Both by the author putting you into the mind of the characters and less directly learning to read the author&#039;s mind as to why he wrote/said what he did.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Derbyshire has a review up of a Denis Dutton&#8217;s book &#8220;The Art Instinct&#8221; that addresses these types of problems, that is evolutionary psych arguments about the arts including fiction.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.johnderbyshire.com/Reviews/HumanSciences/artinstinct.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.johnderbyshire.com/Reviews/HumanSciences/artinstinct.html</a></p>
<p>One of the primary uses of stories by Denis Dutton&#8217;s theory is teaching &#8220;mind reading&#8221; skills.  Both by the author putting you into the mind of the characters and less directly learning to read the author&#8217;s mind as to why he wrote/said what he did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Pearson</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389087</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389087</guid>
		<description>Robin, if fiction story telling is all about signalling, why not signal directly (giving gifts, telling flattering truths about oneself)?

That is: why is fiction production and consumption preferred over other types of signalling?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin, if fiction story telling is all about signalling, why not signal directly (giving gifts, telling flattering truths about oneself)?</p>
<p>That is: why is fiction production and consumption preferred over other types of signalling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Hanson</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389086</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389086</guid>
		<description>Hal, we prefer as associates those we think will be nice to us; shouldn&#039;t it be a reproductive advantage to be seen that way?

Alan, you think the reason you really enjoy something can&#039;t be signaling?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hal, we prefer as associates those we think will be nice to us; shouldn&#8217;t it be a reproductive advantage to be seen that way?</p>
<p>Alan, you think the reason you really enjoy something can&#8217;t be signaling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Gunn</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389085</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Gunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389085</guid>
		<description>Some things aren&#039;t about signaling. I read a lot of fiction; when I was a kid, I preferred reading to social activities. Most of my friends don&#039;t read any fiction at all, so far as I can tell; I feel lost without a novel or two in progress. The signaling explanation could perhaps explain why people would pretend to like fiction, or why they might read it even though they didn&#039;t enjoy it, though the argument seems strained. But how is it an explanation for enjoying fiction? For enjoying some kinds of fiction more than others? For why I re-read Cozzens a couple of times a year (and have never mentioned this to anybody before today)?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some things aren&#8217;t about signaling. I read a lot of fiction; when I was a kid, I preferred reading to social activities. Most of my friends don&#8217;t read any fiction at all, so far as I can tell; I feel lost without a novel or two in progress. The signaling explanation could perhaps explain why people would pretend to like fiction, or why they might read it even though they didn&#8217;t enjoy it, though the argument seems strained. But how is it an explanation for enjoying fiction? For enjoying some kinds of fiction more than others? For why I re-read Cozzens a couple of times a year (and have never mentioned this to anybody before today)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal Finney</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389084</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal Finney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389084</guid>
		<description>In the old days, the main way of consuming fiction would have been in a group, listening to a story teller. Some people would enjoy this and eagerly participate, while others would be less interested and wander off. So there would be plenty of opportunity to observe and know who loves to consume fiction and who does not.

My instinct is that sexual selection plays a role here. Being a good story teller is sexually attractive, and to a lesser degree so is being an avid story listener. That is how I feel, anyway. But I can&#039;t see a connection to reproductive fitness, which you&#039;d expect for a sexually attractive trait.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the old days, the main way of consuming fiction would have been in a group, listening to a story teller. Some people would enjoy this and eagerly participate, while others would be less interested and wander off. So there would be plenty of opportunity to observe and know who loves to consume fiction and who does not.</p>
<p>My instinct is that sexual selection plays a role here. Being a good story teller is sexually attractive, and to a lesser degree so is being an avid story listener. That is how I feel, anyway. But I can&#8217;t see a connection to reproductive fitness, which you&#8217;d expect for a sexually attractive trait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Pearson</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389083</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389083</guid>
		<description>Robin, there might be another side to the story of avoiding bias from stories. Listeners also do not want to get biased one way or the other. And assuming the story teller gets some payment from telling the story that satisfies the listener/listeners parents, that gives an incentive for the story teller to give the people what they want.

Giving lots of (one sided) real world examples is a sure tool of a demagogue/self-aggrandizer. So maybe it is safer for the listeners to avoid all real world examples for foundational ideas.

I don&#039;t buy the stories we like or propagate necessarily promoting positive characteristics about ourselves. I&#039;m thinking of ancient myths mainly, they don&#039;t have people/gods thinking coherently or all being paragons of good or bad. When people told of Odin often tricking people (including his own son), was the teller trying to make people think he would often trick them?

Maybe it is more important in modern days to signal our moralities?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin, there might be another side to the story of avoiding bias from stories. Listeners also do not want to get biased one way or the other. And assuming the story teller gets some payment from telling the story that satisfies the listener/listeners parents, that gives an incentive for the story teller to give the people what they want.</p>
<p>Giving lots of (one sided) real world examples is a sure tool of a demagogue/self-aggrandizer. So maybe it is safer for the listeners to avoid all real world examples for foundational ideas.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t buy the stories we like or propagate necessarily promoting positive characteristics about ourselves. I&#8217;m thinking of ancient myths mainly, they don&#8217;t have people/gods thinking coherently or all being paragons of good or bad. When people told of Odin often tricking people (including his own son), was the teller trying to make people think he would often trick them?</p>
<p>Maybe it is more important in modern days to signal our moralities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constant</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389082</link>
		<dc:creator>Constant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2009/01/why-fiction-lies.html#comment-389082</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Utilitiarianism is like a Turing machine of moral systems - if a morality is computable, and finitely expressible, you can represent it by some function - which describes the action to be taken - a utility function.&lt;/i&gt;

That makes an large assumption about what sort of thing a morality must be.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Utilitiarianism is like a Turing machine of moral systems &#8211; if a morality is computable, and finitely expressible, you can represent it by some function &#8211; which describes the action to be taken &#8211; a utility function.</i></p>
<p>That makes an large assumption about what sort of thing a morality must be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
