<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Futarchy&#8217; is NYT Buzzword of &#8217;08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html</link>
	<description>Overcoming Bias is economist Robin Hanson’s blog, on honesty, signaling, disagreement, forecasting, and the far future.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:20:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Making up rational-sounding stories, rebranding atheists, novelists playing god &#171; Mike Kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-567565</link>
		<dc:creator>Making up rational-sounding stories, rebranding atheists, novelists playing god &#171; Mike Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-567565</guid>
		<description>[...] Robin Hanson on Futarchy as a buzzword. My comment there: Maybe futarchy&#8217;s rising prominence as an idea will get it noticed by more companies who will try it for making decision privately, deciding what their next move should be. I guess there would be problems of a business maybe not having a big enough number of employees betting. I suppose the bigger companies are possibly more conservative than the smaller ones, and less likely to implement, whereas smaller companies might be more daring but not have enough employees to make an internal betting market. Is that a problem or am I way off? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Robin Hanson on Futarchy as a buzzword. My comment there: Maybe futarchy&#8217;s rising prominence as an idea will get it noticed by more companies who will try it for making decision privately, deciding what their next move should be. I guess there would be problems of a business maybe not having a big enough number of employees betting. I suppose the bigger companies are possibly more conservative than the smaller ones, and less likely to implement, whereas smaller companies might be more daring but not have enough employees to make an internal betting market. Is that a problem or am I way off? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Hanson</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-389918</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-389918</guid>
		<description>Johnicholas, SimCity policy could be a great place to run a trial.

Mike, having a small number of traders is not a problem if those traders know as much as anyone about the topic, so a small company could be a fine place to run a trial.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johnicholas, SimCity policy could be a great place to run a trial.</p>
<p>Mike, having a small number of traders is not a problem if those traders know as much as anyone about the topic, so a small company could be a fine place to run a trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-389917</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-389917</guid>
		<description>Maybe futarchy&#039;s rising prominence as an idea will get it noticed by more companies who will try it for making decision privately, deciding what their next move should be.  I guess there would be problems of a business maybe not having a big enough number of employees betting.  I suppose the bigger companies are possibly more conservative than the smaller ones, and less likely to implement, whereas smaller companies might be more daring but not have enough employees to make an internal betting market.  Is that a problem or am I way off?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe futarchy&#8217;s rising prominence as an idea will get it noticed by more companies who will try it for making decision privately, deciding what their next move should be.  I guess there would be problems of a business maybe not having a big enough number of employees betting.  I suppose the bigger companies are possibly more conservative than the smaller ones, and less likely to implement, whereas smaller companies might be more daring but not have enough employees to make an internal betting market.  Is that a problem or am I way off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnicholas</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-389916</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-389916</guid>
		<description>I tried to do this once, betting and voting on a SimCity simulation.

My intuition is that going so rapidly to large-scale systems isn&#039;t likely to work.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to do this once, betting and voting on a SimCity simulation.</p>
<p>My intuition is that going so rapidly to large-scale systems isn&#8217;t likely to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hopefully Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-389915</link>
		<dc:creator>Hopefully Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-389915</guid>
		<description>Why not pitch the Obama administration directly? The narrative is that they&#039;re very open to experts. Also, look at ambitious, technocratic governors and big city mayors looking to distinguish themselves. I think Bloomberg might be open -I think he experimented with Dryer&#039;s idea about pay incentives for school performance, with his own pocket money.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not pitch the Obama administration directly? The narrative is that they&#8217;re very open to experts. Also, look at ambitious, technocratic governors and big city mayors looking to distinguish themselves. I think Bloomberg might be open -I think he experimented with Dryer&#8217;s idea about pay incentives for school performance, with his own pocket money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frelkins</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-389914</link>
		<dc:creator>frelkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 04:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-389914</guid>
		<description>@Patri

This may seem off-topic at first, but it really isn&#039;t: are you actually practicing NVC? I consider my prediction market as part of an NVC maneuver, since it&#039;s factual, not judgmental. I&#039;m wondering if you&#039;d like to talk about that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Patri</p>
<p>This may seem off-topic at first, but it really isn&#8217;t: are you actually practicing NVC? I consider my prediction market as part of an NVC maneuver, since it&#8217;s factual, not judgmental. I&#8217;m wondering if you&#8217;d like to talk about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Hanson</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-389913</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-389913</guid>
		<description>Eliezer, it seems to me the resources needed to make the markets you suggest could be as easily used for a first trial, which seems more likely to lead to further trials.

Patri and Grant, I&#039;m willing to talk anyone with the power to act.

Bryan, you did indeed.  :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eliezer, it seems to me the resources needed to make the markets you suggest could be as easily used for a first trial, which seems more likely to lead to further trials.</p>
<p>Patri and Grant, I&#8217;m willing to talk anyone with the power to act.</p>
<p>Bryan, you did indeed.  <img src='http://www.overcomingbias.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliezer Yudkowsky</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-389912</link>
		<dc:creator>Eliezer Yudkowsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 02:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-389912</guid>
		<description>Excuse me if I&#039;m being overly recursive, but wouldn&#039;t the logical first step be to set up a small market on which initial steps toward futarchy are most likely to pay off - say, a market on which individuals to approach for funding to set up a larger market on which countries might accept various steps toward futarchy?  (If it works, the Singularity Institute might be tempted to set up a market on which individuals are most likely to fund us... I wonder if we should try that anyway?)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me if I&#8217;m being overly recursive, but wouldn&#8217;t the logical first step be to set up a small market on which initial steps toward futarchy are most likely to pay off &#8211; say, a market on which individuals to approach for funding to set up a larger market on which countries might accept various steps toward futarchy?  (If it works, the Singularity Institute might be tempted to set up a market on which individuals are most likely to fund us&#8230; I wonder if we should try that anyway?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patri Friedman</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-389911</link>
		<dc:creator>Patri Friedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-389911</guid>
		<description>Singapore seems like your best bet, at least, until there are seasteads.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Singapore seems like your best bet, at least, until there are seasteads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Caplan</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-389910</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Caplan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/12/futarchy-is-nyt-buzzword-of-08.html#comment-389910</guid>
		<description>Woh!  I witnessed the birth of a buzzword!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woh!  I witnessed the birth of a buzzword!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 442/459 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: overcomingbias-assets.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.overcomingbias.com @ 2012-02-11 23:37:15 -->
