<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Break It Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/07/break-it-down.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/07/break-it-down.html</link>
	<description>Overcoming Bias is economist Robin Hanson’s blog, on honesty, signaling, disagreement, forecasting, and the far future.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:21:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: If too much of “this stuff” takes away our empathy and understanding that this is a tragedy – albeit not worse than someone being shot anywhere else, then that perhaps is a problem of revisionism. &#171; Entitled to an Opinion</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-428932</link>
		<dc:creator>If too much of “this stuff” takes away our empathy and understanding that this is a tragedy – albeit not worse than someone being shot anywhere else, then that perhaps is a problem of revisionism. &#171; Entitled to an Opinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-428932</guid>
		<description>[...] the awful Hansonian reductionist that I am, I wish that Smith &amp; co would &#8220;break it down&#8221; when it comes to their heretical thoughts. There is a constant conflation of holocaust [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the awful Hansonian reductionist that I am, I wish that Smith &amp; co would &#8220;break it down&#8221; when it comes to their heretical thoughts. There is a constant conflation of holocaust [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweating Through Fog</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-426997</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweating Through Fog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-426997</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Having written my own Female Privilege List (and thanks for the link!), and having debated the merits of the male and female lists, I decided that the next step was to write a list of the privileges that would be gained if either the male or female list &quot;won&quot;. Here it is - the &lt;a href=&quot;http://sweatingthroughfog.blogspot.com/2008/07/victim-privilege-list.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Victim Privilege List&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having written my own Female Privilege List (and thanks for the link!), and having debated the merits of the male and female lists, I decided that the next step was to write a list of the privileges that would be gained if either the male or female list &#8220;won&#8221;. Here it is &#8211; the <a href="http://sweatingthroughfog.blogspot.com/2008/07/victim-privilege-list.html" rel="nofollow">Victim Privilege List</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ballgame</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-426996</link>
		<dc:creator>ballgame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-426996</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;First of all, Robin, a rather belated thanks for the link to my &#039;female privilege checklist&#039; post; it sparked a fair bit of traffic to Feminist Critics and seems to have spurred a number of blog discussions on the topic.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I did want to clear up a few misconceptions that some commenters here seem to have formed from reading that checklist. Cyan said, &quot;The irony of the female privilege checklist linked above is that it is presented as as part of an argument against feminism ...&quot; It may surprise Cyan to learn that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.feministcritics.org/blog/2007/02/03/hi-im-ballgame-and-im-a-feminist-%E2%80%A6/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I am in fact a feminist myself (with caveats)&lt;/a&gt; and completely agree with the ostensible goal of (some) feminists to eliminate gender penalties for both sexes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I say &quot;ostensible&quot; because it&#039;s been my experience in the feminist blogosphere that the awareness among most feminists about the extent of male &#039;disprivilege&#039; is rather extraordinarily low, and far lower than the awareness that many feminists think they have, which was one of the reasons I compiled the &#039;female privilege checklist&#039; in the first place. It was not my intent to prove that &#039;men have it worse&#039;, only that it isn&#039;t self-evident that &lt;i&gt;women&lt;/i&gt; have it worse. Indeed, though I suspect your suggestion that, &quot;The next obvious step is to assign point values to such privileges, so we can add them up and compare totals,&quot; was a tad tongue-in-cheek, the suggestion is a not-unreasonable rejoinder to many feminists who assert that women (only) are oppressed and men (only) are privileged without providing the requisite theoretical argument demonstrating that this is so.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, Robin, a rather belated thanks for the link to my &#8216;female privilege checklist&#8217; post; it sparked a fair bit of traffic to Feminist Critics and seems to have spurred a number of blog discussions on the topic.</p>
<p>I did want to clear up a few misconceptions that some commenters here seem to have formed from reading that checklist. Cyan said, &#8220;The irony of the female privilege checklist linked above is that it is presented as as part of an argument against feminism &#8230;&#8221; It may surprise Cyan to learn that <a href="http://www.feministcritics.org/blog/2007/02/03/hi-im-ballgame-and-im-a-feminist-%E2%80%A6/" rel="nofollow">I am in fact a feminist myself (with caveats)</a> and completely agree with the ostensible goal of (some) feminists to eliminate gender penalties for both sexes.</p>
<p>I say &#8220;ostensible&#8221; because it&#8217;s been my experience in the feminist blogosphere that the awareness among most feminists about the extent of male &#8216;disprivilege&#8217; is rather extraordinarily low, and far lower than the awareness that many feminists think they have, which was one of the reasons I compiled the &#8216;female privilege checklist&#8217; in the first place. It was not my intent to prove that &#8216;men have it worse&#8217;, only that it isn&#8217;t self-evident that <i>women</i> have it worse. Indeed, though I suspect your suggestion that, &#8220;The next obvious step is to assign point values to such privileges, so we can add them up and compare totals,&#8221; was a tad tongue-in-cheek, the suggestion is a not-unreasonable rejoinder to many feminists who assert that women (only) are oppressed and men (only) are privileged without providing the requisite theoretical argument demonstrating that this is so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Crossman</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-426995</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Crossman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-426995</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;m Andrea: &lt;i&gt;Rape is a great unfairness and cruelty of life. It is male privilege which says &quot;suck it up honey, and deal with the likelyhood of it happening to you&quot;. I&#039;m paraphrasing several jerks in this thread. Yes, I noticed you are a jerk.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It would be good if you indicated who you are actually arguing against.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve gone through this thread looking for what you might be referring to. Admittedly, I&#039;ve just had four shots of Wyborowa, so I might not be at most observant right now. But the only posts that used the word &quot;rape&quot; were:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Eliezer explaining that not being raped shouldn&#039;t be a privilege but rather a basic standard of living for all.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Kaj Sotala agreeing that it should be, but noting that it wasn&#039;t.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Caledonian saying that the odds of being raped were a function of &quot;psychological and physiological factors that are not under society&#039;s control&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cyan saying that rape rates were falling and that social change was having a positive effect in this area.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Caledonian saying that equalizing the odds of getting raped for both sexes is not a step in the process of eliminating rape.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cyan agreeing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;TGGP saying that the decline in rape might be a result of a general decline in crime.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My admittedly hasty search has also failed to find any other posts that implicitly mentioned rape. So, who are you paraphrasing, please? Of all these posts, Caledonian&#039;s first seems most likely to be interpreted in your way, but it&#039;s still an extremely uncharitable, nay, deliberately hostile interpretation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>m Andrea: <i>Rape is a great unfairness and cruelty of life. It is male privilege which says &#8220;suck it up honey, and deal with the likelyhood of it happening to you&#8221;. I&#8217;m paraphrasing several jerks in this thread. Yes, I noticed you are a jerk.</i></p>
<p>It would be good if you indicated who you are actually arguing against.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve gone through this thread looking for what you might be referring to. Admittedly, I&#8217;ve just had four shots of Wyborowa, so I might not be at most observant right now. But the only posts that used the word &#8220;rape&#8221; were:</p>
<p>Eliezer explaining that not being raped shouldn&#8217;t be a privilege but rather a basic standard of living for all.</p>
<p>Kaj Sotala agreeing that it should be, but noting that it wasn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Caledonian saying that the odds of being raped were a function of &#8220;psychological and physiological factors that are not under society&#8217;s control&#8221;.</p>
<p>Cyan saying that rape rates were falling and that social change was having a positive effect in this area.</p>
<p>Caledonian saying that equalizing the odds of getting raped for both sexes is not a step in the process of eliminating rape.</p>
<p>Cyan agreeing.</p>
<p>TGGP saying that the decline in rape might be a result of a general decline in crime.</p>
<p>My admittedly hasty search has also failed to find any other posts that implicitly mentioned rape. So, who are you paraphrasing, please? Of all these posts, Caledonian&#8217;s first seems most likely to be interpreted in your way, but it&#8217;s still an extremely uncharitable, nay, deliberately hostile interpretation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urandom</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-426994</link>
		<dc:creator>urandom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-426994</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Its necessary to determine which sex is more disadvantaged because its essentially impossible to pursue societal change that benefits both sexes equally. You need to know which sex is more disadvantaged so that you can focus on the right reforms and not passively make society more unjust. The bulk of the horrible things feminists do and have done are to take situations where both sexes have problems, deal selective with those affecting women, and then produce situations that only disadvantage men.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If someone wanted a society with absolute gender equality (a goal of debatable merit), they would do exactly what Robert Hanson says, figure out which sex is more disadvantaged, work selectively for that sex until theres a broad balance, and then work for both sexes equally.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And, as an aside, theres very little reason to think that men ought to have shorter life expectancies. Theres absolutely no reason to believe that women naturally live longer, its well established that men have lived longer than women for the vast majority of human existence and in the vast majority of societies. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its necessary to determine which sex is more disadvantaged because its essentially impossible to pursue societal change that benefits both sexes equally. You need to know which sex is more disadvantaged so that you can focus on the right reforms and not passively make society more unjust. The bulk of the horrible things feminists do and have done are to take situations where both sexes have problems, deal selective with those affecting women, and then produce situations that only disadvantage men.</p>
<p>If someone wanted a society with absolute gender equality (a goal of debatable merit), they would do exactly what Robert Hanson says, figure out which sex is more disadvantaged, work selectively for that sex until theres a broad balance, and then work for both sexes equally.</p>
<p>And, as an aside, theres very little reason to think that men ought to have shorter life expectancies. Theres absolutely no reason to believe that women naturally live longer, its well established that men have lived longer than women for the vast majority of human existence and in the vast majority of societies. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heh</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-426993</link>
		<dc:creator>Heh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-426993</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Grant, they call themselves Feminists because when it comes down to it, they want power the power to drag those who are &#039;privileged&#039; down. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It isn&#039;t about equality. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If it were about equality then feminists, neo-marxists, cultural study theorists, and the rest of the postmodern/poststructuralist crowd would make their political point from a politically neutral base and try to pull minorities up to &#039;privileged&#039; positions. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They don&#039;t do this. They take the reverse position and try pull the privileged down. Why else would they make endless guilt-riden lists of &#039;woe is me&#039; and make out that being &#039;privileged&#039; is something to be &#039;aware&#039; of and something &#039;privileged&#039; people should personally curb? Are not many of the privileged positions good things for EVERYONE to have? Shouldn&#039;t EVERYONE be privileged? Instead we have to settle for second best: Non-privileges for everyone (overlooking the highly ironic position of said cultural theorists who privilege their own opinions over any other social criticism or organisation). &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Like Eliezer said, it leaves a dirty taste in your mouth. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grant, they call themselves Feminists because when it comes down to it, they want power the power to drag those who are &#8216;privileged&#8217; down. </p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t about equality. </p>
<p>If it were about equality then feminists, neo-marxists, cultural study theorists, and the rest of the postmodern/poststructuralist crowd would make their political point from a politically neutral base and try to pull minorities up to &#8216;privileged&#8217; positions. </p>
<p>They don&#8217;t do this. They take the reverse position and try pull the privileged down. Why else would they make endless guilt-riden lists of &#8216;woe is me&#8217; and make out that being &#8216;privileged&#8217; is something to be &#8216;aware&#8217; of and something &#8216;privileged&#8217; people should personally curb? Are not many of the privileged positions good things for EVERYONE to have? Shouldn&#8217;t EVERYONE be privileged? Instead we have to settle for second best: Non-privileges for everyone (overlooking the highly ironic position of said cultural theorists who privilege their own opinions over any other social criticism or organisation). </p>
<p>Like Eliezer said, it leaves a dirty taste in your mouth. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loki on the run</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-426992</link>
		<dc:creator>loki on the run</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-426992</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, m Andrea, I have never ever thought of raping a woman and regard children as sacred (but not my responsibility if they did not come from my sperm). I resent your implication that I am responsible for any rapists out there. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is easy to avoid rapists.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, m Andrea, I have never ever thought of raping a woman and regard children as sacred (but not my responsibility if they did not come from my sperm). I resent your implication that I am responsible for any rapists out there. </p>
<p>It is easy to avoid rapists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loki on the run</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-426991</link>
		<dc:creator>loki on the run</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-426991</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Being lied to about the paternity of your alleged offspring is a great unfairness of life and it is female privilege to say &quot;suck it up dude and pay me child support for the child that is not yours because you did not think to ask for a DNA test.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being lied to about the paternity of your alleged offspring is a great unfairness of life and it is female privilege to say &#8220;suck it up dude and pay me child support for the child that is not yours because you did not think to ask for a DNA test.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hopefully Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-426990</link>
		<dc:creator>Hopefully Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-426990</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot; I have been married for more than 20 years and have three offspring, all female. DNA tests that I required before I sprung for tuition have revealed that they are my offspring&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hilarious juxtposition of sentences, loki.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; I have been married for more than 20 years and have three offspring, all female. DNA tests that I required before I sprung for tuition have revealed that they are my offspring&#8221;</p>
<p>Hilarious juxtposition of sentences, loki.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m Andrea</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-426989</link>
		<dc:creator>m Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/07/break-it-down.html#comment-426989</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Rape is a great unfairness and cruelty of life.  It is male privilege which says &quot;suck it up honey, and deal with the likelyhood of it happening to you&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m paraphrasing several jerks in this thread.  Yes, I noticed you are a jerk.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rape is a great unfairness and cruelty of life.  It is male privilege which says &#8220;suck it up honey, and deal with the likelyhood of it happening to you&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m paraphrasing several jerks in this thread.  Yes, I noticed you are a jerk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 438/455 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: overcomingbias-assets.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.overcomingbias.com @ 2012-02-11 17:40:28 -->
