<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deliberation in Prediction Markets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/01/deliberation-in.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/01/deliberation-in.html</link>
	<description>Overcoming Bias is economist Robin Hanson’s blog, on honesty, signaling, disagreement, forecasting, and the far future.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:33:43 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Volokh Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/01/deliberation-in.html#comment-408773</link>
		<dc:creator>The Volokh Conspiracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/01/deliberation-in-prediction-markets.html#comment-408773</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Deliberating with Prediction Markets:&lt;/strong&gt;

Prediction markets may seem inadequately deliberative. On the election markets, for example, participants trade, but do not ordinarily explain their trades. Decision makers in deliberative bodies, in contrast, seek to persuade on...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Deliberating with Prediction Markets:</strong></p>
<p>Prediction markets may seem inadequately deliberative. On the election markets, for example, participants trade, but do not ordinarily explain their trades. Decision makers in deliberative bodies, in contrast, seek to persuade on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Hanson</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/01/deliberation-in.html#comment-408772</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/01/deliberation-in-prediction-markets.html#comment-408772</guid>
		<description>Jess, in using the phrase &quot;rookie mistake&quot; I had in mind that the mistake would not have been made had he followed the standard procedure we drill into economics grad students.  So it is the sort of mistake typical of &quot;rookie&quot; economists.  I didn&#039;t mean that to be condescending - it is relevant to the issue I raised of whether he just happens to make some mistaken claims, or whether he more systematically does not offer support that meets economist&#039;s usual standards.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jess, in using the phrase &#8220;rookie mistake&#8221; I had in mind that the mistake would not have been made had he followed the standard procedure we drill into economics grad students.  So it is the sort of mistake typical of &#8220;rookie&#8221; economists.  I didn&#8217;t mean that to be condescending &#8211; it is relevant to the issue I raised of whether he just happens to make some mistaken claims, or whether he more systematically does not offer support that meets economist&#8217;s usual standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess Riedel</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/01/deliberation-in.html#comment-408771</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess Riedel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/01/deliberation-in-prediction-markets.html#comment-408771</guid>
		<description>As a professor of law at GWU, I&#039;m sure Michael Abramowicz eagerly accepts honest criticism of his work.  Everyone in academia is an adult, and there is no need to moderate your criticism simply because it sounds harsh (or, perhaps, is damning).  However, the term &quot;rookie mistake&quot; is condescending and unecessary.  I suspect this phrase is what caused some readers to have taken exception with your tone.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a professor of law at GWU, I&#8217;m sure Michael Abramowicz eagerly accepts honest criticism of his work.  Everyone in academia is an adult, and there is no need to moderate your criticism simply because it sounds harsh (or, perhaps, is damning).  However, the term &#8220;rookie mistake&#8221; is condescending and unecessary.  I suspect this phrase is what caused some readers to have taken exception with your tone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burger flipper</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/01/deliberation-in.html#comment-408770</link>
		<dc:creator>burger flipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2008/01/deliberation-in-prediction-markets.html#comment-408770</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d hate to see the reviews of the people who didn&#039;t blurb the book.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d hate to see the reviews of the people who didn&#8217;t blurb the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
