Comments on: 200,000 Visits http://www.overcomingbias.com/2007/06/200000_visits.html Overcoming Bias is economist Robin Hanson’s blog, on honesty, signaling, disagreement, forecasting, and the far future. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:21:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: guy in the veal calf office http://www.overcomingbias.com/2007/06/200000_visits.html#comment-418822 guy in the veal calf office Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:55:40 +0000 http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2007/06/200000-visits.html#comment-418822 The prior post was, of course, a joke, an echoing play on the second comment , with which I agree. If my example is illustrative, some people visit regularly and read for education and interest, but don't believe their opinions would be a useful additive to comment threads. Because I enjoy reading comments, I am sensitive to how lame, anecdotal posts can clutter and make the reading less enjoyable. We’ve all been a class with a student who just has to hear himself talk at every opportunity, but adds nothing and instead is a speed bump impeding progress. The prior post was, of course, a joke, an echoing play on the second comment , with which I agree.

If my example is illustrative, some people visit regularly and read for education and interest, but don’t believe their opinions would be a useful additive to comment threads. Because I enjoy reading comments, I am sensitive to how lame, anecdotal posts can clutter and make the reading less enjoyable. We’ve all been a class with a student who just has to hear himself talk at every opportunity, but adds nothing and instead is a speed bump impeding progress.

]]> By: guy in the veal calf office http://www.overcomingbias.com/2007/06/200000_visits.html#comment-418821 guy in the veal calf office Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:44:59 +0000 http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2007/06/200000-visits.html#comment-418821 Long comment sections generally come from posters who rarely read other comments and are often repetitive, redundant and duplicative of what has already been said. Long comment sections generally come from posters who rarely read other comments and are often repetitive, redundant and duplicative of what has already been said.

]]> By: Michael Sullivan http://www.overcomingbias.com/2007/06/200000_visits.html#comment-418820 Michael Sullivan Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:48:38 +0000 http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2007/06/200000-visits.html#comment-418820 If you normalize posts per day and comments per post, then things haven't really dropped off significantly. You had 1.97 posts per day for the first 100,000 views with 13.9 comments per post. Over the second 100,000, you had 1.94 posts per day with 13 comments per post. Getting more readers doesn't seem to imply that there should be more posts, although normally it does mean more comments per post. That said, I find regular comment threads in the triple digits to often be the result of a commentariat that doesn't pay attention to what's already been said, offering essentially the same comment threads multiple times with a different set of voices. Much noise, low signal. I've rarely seen anything even approaching that here. If you normalize posts per day and comments per post, then things haven’t really dropped off significantly.

You had 1.97 posts per day for the first 100,000 views with 13.9 comments per post. Over the second 100,000, you had 1.94 posts per day with 13 comments per post.

Getting more readers doesn’t seem to imply that there should be more posts, although normally it does mean more comments per post.

That said, I find regular comment threads in the triple digits to often be the result of a commentariat that doesn’t pay attention to what’s already been said, offering essentially the same comment threads multiple times with a different set of voices. Much noise, low signal. I’ve rarely seen anything even approaching that here.

]]> By: Ken Kennedy http://www.overcomingbias.com/2007/06/200000_visits.html#comment-418819 Ken Kennedy Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:33:36 +0000 http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2007/06/200000-visits.html#comment-418819 Does your visit count include RSS subscriptions in any way, or are they separate? I started reading the blog via RSS probably right around 100,000 mark (around 3 months ago), but I've noticed that I don't think to comment as much when I'm reading a blog via RSS. (obviously, I can make exceptions. *grin*) Even if the count does not include subscriptions, it still could be a factor. I'll try to remember to post occasionally, however...I very much enjoy the blog! Does your visit count include RSS subscriptions in any way, or are they separate? I started reading the blog via RSS probably right around 100,000 mark (around 3 months ago), but I’ve noticed that I don’t think to comment as much when I’m reading a blog via RSS. (obviously, I can make exceptions. *grin*)

Even if the count does not include subscriptions, it still could be a factor. I’ll try to remember to post occasionally, however…I very much enjoy the blog!

]]>