<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Subduction Phrases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2007/02/subduction_phra.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2007/02/subduction_phra.html</link>
	<description>Overcoming Bias is economist Robin Hanson’s blog, on honesty, signaling, disagreement, forecasting, and the far future.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:23:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Yi</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2007/02/subduction_phra.html#comment-422243</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Yi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 23:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2007/02/subduction-phrases.html#comment-422243</guid>
		<description>The first criterion there reminds me of Norbert Weiner&#039;s humble suggestion(1) that the amount of information carried by a message can be evaluated by finding the probability of that message&#039;s occurring in the space of all possible messages (pretty loosely defined), and then taking the negative logarithm of that quantity, which reminds me in the vaguest sense to the log-barrier function from ...econometrics? (I might really be stretching that reference there).

(1)
http://open-site.org/Science/Mathematics/Applied/Cybernetics/K1_and_K2_-_General_Cybernetics/Information_Theory/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first criterion there reminds me of Norbert Weiner&#8217;s humble suggestion(1) that the amount of information carried by a message can be evaluated by finding the probability of that message&#8217;s occurring in the space of all possible messages (pretty loosely defined), and then taking the negative logarithm of that quantity, which reminds me in the vaguest sense to the log-barrier function from &#8230;econometrics? (I might really be stretching that reference there).</p>
<p>(1)<br />
<a href="http://open-site.org/Science/Mathematics/Applied/Cybernetics/K1_and_K2_-_General_Cybernetics/Information_Theory/" rel="nofollow">http://open-site.org/Science/Mathematics/Applied/Cybernetics/K1_and_K2_-_General_Cybernetics/Information_Theory/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Hanson</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2007/02/subduction_phra.html#comment-422242</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 15:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2007/02/subduction-phrases.html#comment-422242</guid>
		<description>Stuart, those do seem like promising tests.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart, those do seem like promising tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2007/02/subduction_phra.html#comment-422241</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prod.ob.trike.com.au/2007/02/subduction-phrases.html#comment-422241</guid>
		<description>&quot;The unexamined life is not worth living&quot; is another beautiful one, alluring and painful to deconstruct.

A few slogan tests: can you see the slogan being chanted as a mantra? Can you see it being used as an answer to many different questions? Do you see it as a literally true statement rather than a simplification of vast amounts of complex ideas? And, very importantly: do you get angry or contrary if people attack the slogan itself?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The unexamined life is not worth living&#8221; is another beautiful one, alluring and painful to deconstruct.</p>
<p>A few slogan tests: can you see the slogan being chanted as a mantra? Can you see it being used as an answer to many different questions? Do you see it as a literally true statement rather than a simplification of vast amounts of complex ideas? And, very importantly: do you get angry or contrary if people attack the slogan itself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 319/336 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: overcomingbias-assets.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.overcomingbias.com @ 2012-02-11 19:36:17 -->
